2 Weeks Ago
|
#16 |
|
Signed, sealed, botheled
 
|
^Me too
 The last 4 Newtons from the first editorial. A couple of shots from the second one to come.
__________________
What can be shown, cannot be said. |
|
|
|
2 Weeks Ago
|
#17 |
|
rising star
|
Genius Newton, so much greater than Bailey!
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref...23003&ref=name |
|
|
|
2 Weeks Ago
|
#18 |
|
Signed, sealed, botheled
|
Yes, Newton never takes a mediocre shot. In the last post, the second image looks a bit like Carine Roitfeld btw, the second frame.
__________________
What can be shown, cannot be said. |
|
|
|
2 Weeks Ago
|
#19 | |
|
Rest in peace
|
Quote:
 . I love this editorial and Bourdins too.
__________________
Daria Werbowy. Jennifer Messelier. Megan Fox. Amanda Seyfried. |
|
|
|
|
2 Weeks Ago
|
#20 |
|
rising star
|
Maybe the heavy make-up eyes... Except that Jill Kennington have heaven-like eyes!
Oh please, post here and on the Newton thread more and more, i am starved, mostly his 60's and early 70's work (after, it is too porno chic)!
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref...23003&ref=name |
|
|
|
2 Weeks Ago
|
#21 |
|
Signed, sealed, botheled
|
^I like all Newton's work, except the extreme nude shots, which I think are a tad boring.
Last shots from this issue are some rare shots of Jean Shrimpton by Newton. She had a field day, really, Bourdin and Newton in one issue! I love the first image in particular. Of course, you can never know what he was thinking, but it brings to my mind an idea of an ironic statement about the model as trophy.
__________________
What can be shown, cannot be said. |
|
|
|
2 Weeks Ago
|
#22 |
|
rising star
|
I think it is that too, even her belt in the first shot look like a winner prize...
It is true, technically Newton is always brillant, but the waste is big fake boobs, women with robot like figure etc...
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref...23003&ref=name |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
