Originally posted by chickonspeed@Nov 4th, 2003 - 10:15 pm What bothers me most is those awful, vapid cover lines. 10 MINUTES TO GREAT HAIR! STRESS-FREE SHOPPING! Does anyone honestly care? Because I as hell don't.
Oceans of angels, oceans of stars
Originally posted by Astrid21@Nov 5th, 2003 - 2:12 am I agree with Chickonspeed and Spacemiu.
Salma looks very lovely, but the cover looks very dated and disorganized.
Thanks for the picture, pearandapples.
astrid... the magazine is worse! it is jumbled and schizophrenic... and muddled. the layouts are just horrible. there was one picture that i liked in it... and that is the pic of the red dress. the linda e layout is as bad as you can imagine. it is her with all of these 80's designers...
the rest... dull. poor bazaar!
the salma interview is so fun though. she talks about how she has to wear a minimizer at times and how it is so hard to dress her frame when designers do not design for her body type. she is lovely.
dont you think that these fashion magazines are all morphing into the same thing? they think readers are interested in the quick diets, better sex etc that cosmo and the like plasters on their covers and think they will sell more, instead of being true to their roots and sticking to the fashion, despite lower numbers?
sometimes it is fun to thumb through those trashy magazines, but you would hope those who are fundamentally about fashion would stick to their stuff.....