How to Join
the Fashion Spot / Front Row / Fashion... In Depth
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Rules Links Mobile How to Join
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
16-09-2011
  1
backstage pass
 
Blodeuwedd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Gender: femme
Posts: 610
Ashley Mears' "Pricing Beauty": What a sociologist learned as a fashion model
America's Next Top Sociologist

A daylong photo shoot for Vogue pays only $150, women are like milk cartons, and other insights from the academic study of modeling.

By Libby Copeland
Posted Wednesday, Sept. 7, 2011, at 1:06 PM ET slate.com



There's a long tradition among academics of embedding in an occupation to study it. In the middle of the last century, social psychologist Marie Jahoda worked in an English paper factory to learn about about the lives of factory girls. More recently, sociologist Loïc Wacquant studied boxers by becoming one, while Sudhir Venkatesh spent seven years with a gang in the Chicago projects. One academic worked as a cotton picker, another entered prison as an inmate.

Ashley Mears embedded as a model. Then an NYU grad student in sociology, Mears had an idea what she was in for. She'd modeled in college, and knew that she still met the narrow physical requirements for the job. But this time around, she took notes after walking runways and attending casting calls. She interviewed other models as well as the industry tastemakers who hire them–agents, designers, magazine editors. Her new book, Pricing Beauty, offers a mostly grim picture of what's endured by those trying to make a living off their looks. Models are utterly dispensable, in Mears' telling: They labor at the mercy of inscrutable bosses, lousy pay, and punishing physical requirements. And for most of them, that's how the job will remain until they retire at the ripe old age of, say, 26.

Like actors and musicians, models work in a winner-take-all market, in which a few people reap rewards disproportionate to their talent, and everyone else scrapes by. This trend has become more exaggerated since the '90s, Mears writes, as the market has become glutted with young women from around the world, leading to greater turnover and plummeting pay rates. Would-be models are "scooped up, tried out, and spit out in rapid succession," she writes.

Through interviews, Mears investigated the financial state of the (unnamed) small modeling firm she worked for in Manhattan.* She found that 20 percent of the models on the agency's books were in debt to the agency. Foreign models, in particular, seem to exist in a kind of indentured servitude, she writes, often owing as much as $10,000 to their agencies for visas, flights, and test shoots, all before they even go on their first casting call. And once a model does nab a job, the pay is often meager. Mears herself walked runways, sat for photo shoots for an online clothing catalog, modeled for designers in showrooms, and went on countless unpaid casting calls. During her first year of research she worked mornings, evenings, and weekends around her graduate classes and earned about $11,000.
Advertisement

Why do so many models operate against their own economic interests? Mears details how, in the fashion world, there is typically an inverse relationship between the prestige of a job and how much the model gets paid. A day-long shoot for Vogue pays a paltry $150, for instance, while a shoot for Britain's influential i-D magazine, which Mears calls "one of the most sought-after editorial clients for a model," pays absolutely nothing, not even the cost of transportation or a copy of the magazine for the model's portfolio.

The alternative to high-fashion poverty is to be a "money girl," working for catalogs and in showroom fittings, jobs that pay well and reliably. The best-paid model at Mears' agency, for instance, was a 52-year-old showroom model with "the precise size 8 body needed to fit clothing for a major American retailer. She makes $500/hour and works every day." But the commercial end of modeling is widely derided within the industry as low-rent, as mere work without glamour. Once a model has done too many commercial jobs, she is thought to have cheapened herself, and it's exceedingly difficult for her to return to high fashion.
So many models operate against their short-term interests, hoping that by investing time now they will hit pay dirt later in the form of fame and a high-paying luxury ad campaign. The catch is that there simply isn't much time to invest; the older a model gets, the more she "exudes failure," Mears writes. She quotes a 23-year-old model who'd been instructed by her agency to say she was 19: "They said it's like when you go to the grocery store to buy milk, which milk carton would you want, one that is going to expire tomorrow or one that will expire next week?"
The funny thing is that even though Mears knew the odds were against her, and despite her academic ambitions, she, too, found herself drawn in by the fantasy that the big time was just around the corner. In her mid-20s, she was ancient by industry standards, but she kept modeling for almost three years after her re-entry into the field, well after she had enough material for the dissertation that would later become this book. Each phone call she got from her booker, ordering her to hustle across town right now to a casting, felt like the phone call that might change her fate. (Which begs the question, if even Mears could be seduced by the industry, what chance does a poor girl from rural Brazil have?)

"It's the lottery," Mears told me recently over tea at a West Village coffee shop. Now 30, still lithe and luminous in that otherworldly model way, she's an assistant professor of sociology at Boston University. "You realize that the probability is slight but the possibility is so enticing."

There are a number of academics studying the modeling life right now. As a subject for scholarly study the topic may seem slight, but then again, there's been an explosion in what might be termed "girly" studies—looking at the work of strippers and Playboy bunnies, for instance—going back at least as far as the popularity of Madonna studies 20 years ago.

"I just got a request to review an academic paper of lap dancers," said Elizabeth Wissinger, a CUNY sociology professor who has interviewed models for her own book on the industry, which she's currently writing.
The title of Mears' book, Pricing Beauty, refers to her scholarly efforts to understand who or what determines a given model's chances of success in a field glutted with gorgeous people. How does this winner-take-all market produce winners? Why does one tall, underweight, astonishingly beautiful young woman become the face of Chanel No. 5, while another languishes, doing minor magazine shoots that pay little and never catapult her to fame? Those in the industry like to imagine that there is something inevitable about the outcome. When Mears asked how they knew what made a winner, industry tastemakers explained that such models had an ineffable quality, a je ne sais quoi, that elevated them above the rest. "You know, you just know!" a stylist told Mears.

"It's like asking the meaning of life," a booker explained.

But as Mears discovers, the truth is that success in high-fashion modeling has a lot more to do with marketing and chance than it does with the ineffable. In a field saturated with models who have the right measurements and the right skin tone and the right "edgy" looks, bookers and casting agents and stylists and editors engage in a merry-go-round of imitation and blind guesswork, with everyone trying to anticipate what everyone else will like. Once a fresh new face is anointed, clients scramble to nab her for shoots and shows, proclaiming that they, too, see that special something. Mears likens the process to "The Emperor's New Clothes."

Becky Conekin, who teaches history at Yale and is studying what the modeling industry looked like in Great Britain during the middle of the 20th century, told me that her work is a "feminist project of recovery"—that taking models seriously is a way of taking women seriously, wherever we might find them. In a similar spirit, Mears' book, which is heavy on both economic analysis and tales of nobody strivers, gives voice to a group of women who are paid to be seen and not heard. Instead of focusing on the rise of the industry's few Coco Rocha-level superstars, she is interested in young women like Liz, whose story illuminates the very bad odds an aspiring model faces.* After dropping out of college to pursue her career, Liz spends years hustling for little pay in high fashion before finally succeeding in shampoo ads. But even then she is without health insurance. When she develops a stomach tumor, she must declare bankruptcy and move back in with her parents in New Jersey. There Mears finds her, at age 27, without a college degree, training to become a yoga teacher.

Mears' own foray into modeling has its own anticlimactic ending, a dismissal from her agency via a casual email (subject: "Hey Doll!!!"), offering little explanation. She gets one last check, for the grand sum of $150.


Correction, Sept. 7, 2011: This article originally stated that Mears had access to the books of the modeling firm she worked for. She did not. Instead, she compiled information on models' earnings through interviews. (Return to the corrected sentence.)

Correction, Sept. 8, 2011: This article originally misspelled the first name of model Coco Rocha. (Return to the corrected sentence.)

  Reply With Quote
 
16-09-2011
  2
don't look down
 
tigerrouge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Béal Feirste
Gender: femme
Posts: 11,756
"This article originally misspelled the first name of model Coco Rocha"

Choco? Cocoa? I'm suddenly seeing all sorts of opportunities for her in the confectionary sector.

__________________
You're perfect, yes, it's true. But without me, you're only you.
  Reply With Quote
16-09-2011
  3
front row
 
theBlueRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Gender: femme
Posts: 491
I think this is a topic that has been discussed over and over again with the same answers and analysis.

The only issue I see with discussing this kind of topic is that not all markets are included. There are lots of different types of divisions+markets/niches that fall under the "fashion model" category.

I know of Ashley and know of her agency+division and niche. Her analysis seems limited to a particular niche of fashion in NYC.

I think in order to conduct a credible analysis on the modeling industry, someone needs to go more in depth with models from all the agencies and divisions (meaning everyone from IMG to APM to Wilhelmina's Media division).

  Reply With Quote
17-09-2011
  4
front row
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Gender: femme
Posts: 391
I don' t know why people keep spending their time and money to write books and documentaries about this when it's been done a thousand times -- I guess they think theyre being profound, but really everyone knows this about the industry. And most of the criticisms about pay make no sense Do these girls really deserve more when most of them are unskilled workers? $150 for a days work is above minimum wage; there are plenty of people who would gladly trade places and lie on the beach or get pampered instead of flip hamburgers.

And like thebluerider said there are so many different types of models and agencies. I work very closely with an agency in a small town and the standards are a bit more lenient here, but these girls are working. Some of them go off to college, get married, have kids, and then pick up again and are still making money over seas. *edit - no weight discussion on TFS*


Last edited by lucy92; 19-09-2011 at 03:24 PM. Reason: please see tfs guidelines regarding weight discussion
  Reply With Quote
17-09-2011
  5
front row
 
Vega Magnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: South Carolina
Gender: homme
Posts: 436
I don't know much at all about modeling, but it seems to me that one absolutely must have a plan in place to fall back on if one's modeling career fizzles.

__________________
Just say no to Terry Richardson.
  Reply With Quote
18-09-2011
  6
flaunt the imperfection..
 
softgrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: downtown...
Gender: femme
Posts: 50,639
she did it as her dissertation for her masters degree...
so it was basically like homework...and then it got published...
which is quite common...

i think it's good to have stuff like this out there...
too many young people see america's next top model and think that is actually reality....
they have no real clue about the industry...

even people who post on here and claim to be real fashion fans seem to be in denial of how the industry really works and how ugly it can really be on the inside...

this doesn't even talk about how really mean and horrible people can often be---
right to your face~!

i think people would rather not know this stuff though---
they'd rather believe the fantasy and the dream...
people don't want to hear the truth...


__________________
"It is not money that makes you well dressed: it is understanding."
ChristianDior



  Reply With Quote
18-09-2011
  7
fashion icon
 
YoninahAliza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Avonlea
Gender: femme
Posts: 3,344
It's so interesting to read about Ashley's account of what she learned as a model. It's one thing to write about life for models it's another to go out and model and write about it. Especially since Ashley is a sociologist so she understands factors that play into the experience too. Her view is different then the average model because of her background in sociology. Anyways, I always knew that modeling has a dark side, but I never knew that I-D doesn't even pay it's models. That's complete bull****. It's not like it's a magazine that's starting out and cant afford to pay, I-D is well respected and has been around for ages. Honestly, only a few make it "big" yet it's still appalling to see how people mistreat models. They aren't a piece of meat, you know. Anyways, reading a bit about Mears' experience only reinforces my belief that changes need to be made in the industry.

__________________
http://miss-rumphius.tumblr.com/ "It is ever so much easier to be good if your clothes are fashionable." Anne of Green Gables by L.M. Montgomery
  Reply With Quote
19-09-2011
  8
rising star
 
Kayote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Gender: homme
Posts: 169
This was very enlightening.

I think its still means & almost defines how closed off fashion industry is inspite of the economics and global reach.

Saved the article for another read. Cheers

__________________
Salman Khan, Kingpin @ CoutAllure, A startup about individualising fashion.
Google+: gplus.to/SalmanK
  Reply With Quote
19-09-2011
  9
front row
 
sidda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Beijing
Gender: femme
Posts: 251
Quote:
models work in a winner-take-all market, in which a few people reap rewards disproportionate to their talent
Ok, I get what she is saying here and I definitely agree that there are always girls where you are like, "Really? Her?" but there is a reason Magdalena Frackowiak is an Amazing Goddess and Magdalena Whateverblah will never go anywhere. There will always be models who are overhyped by the industry and then burn out quickly, but I'd like to think we don't fangirl/boy for no reason. Luck (tall, correct measurements, beautiful, IT) vs talent is arguable but imo there is also a reason why certain models editorial work will always fall flat.

__________________
◊ Magdalena Frackowiak ◊ Sheila Marquez ◊ Tati Cotliar ◊
  Reply With Quote
19-09-2011
  10
doldrums
 
silk skin paws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Gender: femme
Posts: 1,358
"Why do so many models operate against their own economic interests?"

I think this quote doesn't just applies to models. It's universal. Whenever someone has the upper hand and more power there's this perfect opportunity to exploit others.

  Reply With Quote
19-09-2011
  11
fashion icon
 
YoninahAliza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Avonlea
Gender: femme
Posts: 3,344
^Completely agree with you about that quote. Just use the word models as a substitute and it really fits anyone who's working in an industry which treats them like crap. Or really, on a larger scale why do we let people take advantage of us, always thinking that our luck will someday change? But like you said, it's all about exploiting others. Sadly, way too often when someone's in a position of power they exploit others, knowing full well that this person is putting full stock in them. From what I can tell it seems like models are putting a lot of faith into these agencies who are misleading them into thinking they are the next Kate Moss or whoever in order to achieve economic success at these peoples expenses.

__________________
http://miss-rumphius.tumblr.com/ "It is ever so much easier to be good if your clothes are fashionable." Anne of Green Gables by L.M. Montgomery
  Reply With Quote
20-09-2011
  12
fashion elite
 
purplethistle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: under the sun
Gender: femme
Posts: 2,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by silk skin paws View Post
"Why do so many models operate against their own economic interests?"

I think this quote doesn't just applies to models. It's universal. Whenever someone has the upper hand and more power there's this perfect opportunity to exploit others.
Whatever the answer is to this quote may also be the same answer to those that have a gambling addiction to slot machines where they keep going to the same machine even though they know that most of the time their going to lose.

  Reply With Quote
Reply
Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Tags
ashley, beauty, fashion, learned, mears, model, pricing, sociologist
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"


 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
TheFashionSpot.com is a property of TotallyHer Media, LLC, an Evolve Media LLC company. ©2014 All rights reserved.