Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge (Kate Middleton) (June 2012 - February 2013) - Page 15

Ashcottmanor · 10-07-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by *Kristina*

Why would a magazine be publishing photos from their honeymoon now?

It seems a bit irrelevant since there supposedly from a year ago.

Probably because they would have gotten a lot of heat for it if they did it right after. I knew they wouldn't NOT follow them just because the Palace said not to. Come on, money is King to them.

Anyways love her bathing suit, I have one like that but it's a fuchsia color.

glitterpeacock · 10-07-2012

^ Exactly.
I was just a bit upset on their behalf. They had their press tours and their sensational wedding and I thought that the press had all grown some sort of backbone and decided "no, let them have this honeymoon to themselves". Ah well.

Nymphette · 11-07-2012

Kate looked cute at Wimbledon but the honeymoon pics are really intrusive.

Boomer · 11-07-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nymphette

Kate looked cute at Wimbledon but the honeymoon pics are really intrusive.

I'm still not convinced they are actual pictures...Kate's head and face look processed to me- even though both of their bodies look pretty accurate...I'm not sure I buy it...

- JMJ - · 11-07-2012

/\ Very much agree - something just feels 'wrong' about it. I seriously do not appreciate publications doing this [as if they care, right?] - this time was supposed to have been private for them.

I love that Kate drove herself to Wimbledon - yes, it seems a bit odd given that she could easily hook a limo ride - but it provides private time for she and her sister. Good for her!

I love the DVF clutch she carried - I could use that little clutch!

biba91 · 12-07-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boomer

I'm still not convinced they are actual pictures...Kate's head and face look processed to me- even though both of their bodies look pretty accurate...I'm not sure I buy it...

The pictures are definitely not fake. I was watching the news this morning and there is a big issue about the photogs going too far and breaking the unwritten rule. I think the palace released a statement but can't be 100% sure.

wild roses · 12-07-2012

Yikes! The paps really have crossed a line. That is beyond disrespectful.

helen-rox · 13-07-2012

I get that for a normal person it is crossing a line but this happens to all celebrities, unfortunately royals are considered amongst them.

YoninahAliza · 13-07-2012

The thing about those photo's though is that it was still taken without their permission on their honeymoon. Now I understand that they are famous and this sort of thing happens a lot but in this situation it feels like they crossed the line. It was suppose to be a special holiday for just the two of them and now the whole world will see the pictures of it (if these end up being real). Besides, didn't the royal family ask that they not be disturbed on their honeymoon? If so I suppose they have reason for a lawsuit (though I wonder if they would even do that because it could be seen as meddling).

helen-rox · 13-07-2012

They wouldn't be the first couple snapped on a honey moon without permission though

**HeatherAnne** · 13-07-2012

We're getting a little off-topic here, if you wish to discuss this further please take it to their news thread in Rumor Has It:
http://forums.thefashionspot.com/f63...-143419-6.html

Thanks!

MiuMiuLove · 15-07-2012

Picture of Catherine shopping in Australian magazine "New Idea"

catherine-duchessofcambridge tumblr

Luti21 · 15-07-2012

Totally love how she wears her items over and over again. i don't see any problems in that she doesnt wear exactly the same outfit twice so far. and if her items are really as pricey as the magazines claim then it's no surprise she wears them again she pays for them or her parents or something. I don't understand why she isn't allowed to accept gifts from designers? does anyone know why?

kissmesweet · 15-07-2012

Unlike celebrities (e.g. actors/actresses), the British royals are not allowed to accept gifts like that, because they can't be shown to "endorse" brands or designers.

shannyD · 16-07-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by kissmesweet

Unlike celebrities (e.g. actors/actresses), the British royals are not allowed to accept gifts like that, because they can't be shown to "endorse" brands or designers.

But they do get discounts. For example, the British royals receive a 60% discount off their Audi cars (article).

Catherine probably gets her designer clothes for a discounted price. I think Michelle Obama also gets discounts on designer clothes as well.

FAQ	Calendar	Search	Today's Posts	Mark Forums Read	Rules	Links	Mobile	How to Join

10-07-2012	212
glitterpeacock tfs star Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Manchester Gender: femme Posts: 1,612	^ Exactly. I was just a bit upset on their behalf. They had their press tours and their sensational wedding and I thought that the press had all grown some sort of backbone and decided "no, let them have this honeymoon to themselves". Ah well. __________________ I don't wanna be nice. I think it's clever to swear

11-07-2012	215
- JMJ - rising star Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Mid-Atlantic USA Gender: femme Posts: 169	/\ Very much agree - something just feels 'wrong' about it. I seriously do not appreciate publications doing this [as if they care, right?] - this time was supposed to have been private for them. I love that Kate drove herself to Wimbledon - yes, it seems a bit odd given that she could easily hook a limo ride - but it provides private time for she and her sister. Good for her! I love the DVF clutch she carried - I could use that little clutch! __________________ I have the simplest of taste. I am always satisfied with the best. - Oscar Wilde -

13-07-2012	218
helen-rox V.I.P. Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Australia Gender: femme Posts: 3,875	I get that for a normal person it is crossing a line but this happens to all celebrities, unfortunately royals are considered amongst them. __________________ Tumblr - http://helensamaryan.tumblr.com/

13-07-2012	219
YoninahAliza fashion elite Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Avonlea Gender: femme Posts: 2,922	The thing about those photo's though is that it was still taken without their permission on their honeymoon. Now I understand that they are famous and this sort of thing happens a lot but in this situation it feels like they crossed the line. It was suppose to be a special holiday for just the two of them and now the whole world will see the pictures of it (if these end up being real). Besides, didn't the royal family ask that they not be disturbed on their honeymoon? If so I suppose they have reason for a lawsuit (though I wonder if they would even do that because it could be seen as meddling). __________________ http://miss-rumphius.tumblr.com/ "It is ever so much easier to be good if your clothes are fashionable." Anne of Green Gables by L.M. Montgomery

11-07-2012	213
Nymphette front row Join Date: Jan 2012 Gender: femme Posts: 407	Kate looked cute at Wimbledon but the honeymoon pics are really intrusive.

12-07-2012	217
wild roses trendsetter Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Sandusky Gender: femme Posts: 1,112	Yikes! The paps really have crossed a line. That is beyond disrespectful.

13-07-2012	220
helen-rox V.I.P. Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Australia Gender: femme Posts: 3,875	They wouldn't be the first couple snapped on a honey moon without permission though __________________ Tumblr - http://helensamaryan.tumblr.com/

13-07-2012	221
HeatherAnne .my prison is your brain. Mod Squad Leader Join Date: Jan 2008 Gender: femme Posts: 17,447	We're getting a little off-topic here, if you wish to discuss this further please take it to their news thread in Rumor Has It: http://forums.thefashionspot.com/f63...-143419-6.html Thanks! __________________

15-07-2012	222
MiuMiuLove tfs star Join Date: Feb 2009 Gender: femme Posts: 1,782	Picture of Catherine shopping in Australian magazine "New Idea" catherine-duchessofcambridge tumblr

15-07-2012	223
Luti21 front row Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: up-side down Gender: femme Posts: 259	Totally love how she wears her items over and over again. i don't see any problems in that she doesnt wear exactly the same outfit twice so far. and if her items are really as pricey as the magazines claim then it's no surprise she wears them again she pays for them or her parents or something. I don't understand why she isn't allowed to accept gifts from designers? does anyone know why? __________________ demons come with the territory.

15-07-2012	224
kissmesweet V.I.P. Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Hong Kong/UK Gender: femme Posts: 18,853	Unlike celebrities (e.g. actors/actresses), the British royals are not allowed to accept gifts like that, because they can't be shown to "endorse" brands or designers. __________________ ♥ don't you forget about me.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode