All you people do is blame the stylists. The girl is old enough to chose her own outfits for a photoshoot. I wasn't even talking about the outfits. I was talking about her face which is so incredibly average and plain and her eyes which look dull and lifeless. She literally looks like a young child which is pretty creepy and pedo for a shoot like this.
...since when do you choose your own outfits for a magazine photoshoot? and don't try to tell me that she did her own makeup either.
There IS a point where you can say no, especially when you're a famous actress, not a replaceable model. Rachel McAdams was booked to do the hollywood Vanity Fair cover with Scarlett Johansson and Keira Knightley but when she found out they wanted her nude, she refused and left the shoot, despite the immense publicity she would have recieved if she actually did the cover. (Yes, I know one is nudity and one isn't, but it's the same principle: saying no to something you don't want to do)
At the same time, I don't think Emma's team/handlers saw this in this light. It probably looked different when they were doing the shoot and it didn't occur it would come across this way. They probably thought since there was no nudity and she wasn't stimulating sex (ex. water poured on her or something), it was ok.
She looks really young without makeup. Kind of like Hayden Panettiere.