Emma Watson (June 2004 - February 2010)

[quiet heartbeat]

VS Magazin // heroinchiq @ blogspot

[serenab]

Aww I was just about to post this!

She looks great, this photoshoot is so fun and I am glad she isn't so stiff and posed anymore!!

[quiet heartbeat]

The 1st and 2nd shots make her look like a little girl again. =/ The others are great, though.

[after__eight]

Wow.. she looks terrible. Not to mention like a 10 year old. Jesus christ.

The first and second shot - put some effing makeup one! You look like a freakin' ghost!

[fashionmuse]

I like the photos, for once I get the impression that she had fun during the photoshoot. She has gorgeous pale skin

[quiet heartbeat]

The only thing I think about when I look at the first two photos is:



Yuck. In this case, there's no need for a Time Turner.

[simple_elegance]

Originally Posted by after__eight

Wow.. she looks terrible. Not to mention like a 10 year old. Jesus christ.

The first and second shot - put some effing makeup one! You look like a freakin' ghost!

geez, it's not HER fault, blame the stylists.

anyway, even though the first two shots are rather creepy, i rather like the shoot as a whole. it's completely different from anything she's ever done.

[after__eight]

All you people do is blame the stylists. The girl is old enough to chose her own outfits for a photoshoot. I wasn't even talking about the outfits. I was talking about her face which is so incredibly average and plain and her eyes which look dull and lifeless. She literally looks like a young child which is pretty creepy and pedo for a shoot like this.

[alacrity]

Wait is that a new photoshoot? She looks about 12 in the first few!!

[simple_elegance]

...since when do you choose your own outfits for a magazine photoshoot? and don't try to tell me that she did her own makeup either.

Originally Posted by after__eight

She literally looks like a young child

i believe that was the point...see the doll she's holding? yeah...

[johnnys_girl09]

She looks like a little girl.. Borderline inappropriate almost..

[larien]

Originally Posted by quiet heartbeat

VS Magazin // heroinchiq @ blogspot

Cool

[Caroliiine]

Originally Posted by simple_elegance

...since when do you choose your own outfits for a magazine photoshoot? and don't try to tell me that she did her own makeup either.

There IS a point where you can say no, especially when you're a famous actress, not a replaceable model. Rachel McAdams was booked to do the hollywood Vanity Fair cover with Scarlett Johansson and Keira Knightley but when she found out they wanted her nude, she refused and left the shoot, despite the immense publicity she would have recieved if she actually did the cover. (Yes, I know one is nudity and one isn't, but it's the same principle: saying no to something you don't want to do)

At the same time, I don't think Emma's team/handlers saw this in this light. It probably looked different when they were doing the shoot and it didn't occur it would come across this way. They probably thought since there was no nudity and she wasn't stimulating sex (ex. water poured on her or something), it was ok.

She looks really young without makeup. Kind of like Hayden Panettiere.

[Maeve]

Ouch. She looks like a little girl playing with her mum´s make-up. Only the first pic looks good.

And she should darken her hair, she´d look much better.

[simple_elegance]

actually, she is getting it darkened for Deathly Hallows. thank the lord, lol