Gwyneth Paltrow (August 2003 - June 2009) - Page 59

Fabulyss · 25-10-2005

^Good God, I just realized what a loser I must sound like to defend a celebrity over something like this.

newprincesita · 25-10-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fabulyss

^Good God, I just realized what a loser I must sound like to defend a celebrity over something like this.

Not at all Fabulyss, you´re just the voice of good sense.

Maybe I´m too obsessed with those details, because I don´t like transparences at all outside the bedroom.
I´m not attacking her, but I´m quite sure that she´s helped by many people before appearing in public, and the possibilities of bright lights and flashes is not so far-fetched.

She looks gorgeous and her hair is great. Maybe a tad long but she can pull it.

Fabulyss · 25-10-2005

Good point

boho_babe · 26-10-2005

A DOSE of Stella McCartney style never did anyone any harm, and last night H&M was riding high on her wave. To celebrate the launch of her new, one-off collection for the label, that is bound to cause shopping riots when it arrives in store next month, London's most fabulous convened in an old school, St Olaves, on Tooley Street for a party that was well worth the hype. Kate Moss may not have made it – Italian model Mariacarla Boscono has replaced her as the face of the exclusive line – but Gwyneth Paltrow more than made up for it. "I really liked the whole collection," she told us. "You must write that, I want Stella to read it. If I could only have one piece I'd buy the short sleeved black satin jacket." The show, during which the models played musical chairs as bouncers stole back-to-back chairs in the centre of the catwalk until just two girls were left to fight over the winning attention spot (the mint green silk dress won in the end, despite the model falling on the floor after her contender pulled the chair away), had just the right balance of Stella's sense of humour and stylish charm. There were baggy, silky trousers drawn in at the ankle, low-waisted dresses, satin dungarees and even a budget version of her sexy tie-above-the-knee boots. Gwyneth's black jacket caused quite a stir ( Jasmine Guinness wanted it, too, as well as a sparkly embroidered cardigan), while tuxedo-style coats and tulip-skirted trench coats were all recognisably Stella – so, for that matter were the strictly vegetarian canapés, washed down by plenty of Champagne for a crowd aware that they were witness to a true fashion moment. As Gwyneth battled through the crowd to her car after the show, tailed by a train of paparazzi, fireworks lit the sky above the "Stella McCartney for H&M"-shaped box hedge outside and the high street once again made a play for high fashion's limelight. (October 26 2005, AM)
from vogue

FrockRadar8 · 26-10-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by newprincesita

I don´t think her breasts are saggy, but the see-through effect is not flattering at all. The dress is suppossed to be classy but the nipshow is just

. How comfortable can you be at a premiere with your bobbies on display???

Considering she's shown her "boobies" many times on the big screen, i don't think she's that uncomfortable. Personally, I think she meant to do that...but that's just me. Are those undershorts supposed to lift bums? Because she doesn't have one usually....

thehepburn · 26-10-2005

Paltrow's breasts are normal and natural which means that yes, they are slighty droopy and she needs to wear a bra like everyone else. The fact that she doesnt and she is wearing something see-thru (like she has many times before) offends me because I really dont want to see her boobies.

skim_hazelnut_latte · 26-10-2005

Gwyneth at Stella McCartney's H&M launch (hello magazine)

ShannonMc · 26-10-2005

Frockradar - what she's wearing are called Spanx, they're just meant to hold your tummy in and trim your hips/thighs. I'm sure she didn't think the dress would be see-through, I'd be embarrassed to be caught in those things

FrockRadar8 · 26-10-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShannonMc

Frockradar - what she's wearing are called Spanx, they're just meant to hold your tummy in and trim your hips/thighs. I'm sure she didn't think the dress would be see-through, I'd be embarrassed to be caught in those things

lol...that's what I thought they were...but in one of the pics, her rear looked unusually perky. If spanx did that.....

michele · 26-10-2005

Why should she feel embarassed about wearing spanx? She isn't the only woman in the world to wear them...plus, it should make us heavier women feel better about ourselves, especially if we look up to someone as thin as Gwyneth.

Her butt is pretty big in that one photo. Where did it come from, all of the sudden?

boho_babe · 26-10-2005

from vogue.com

boho_babe · 26-10-2005

you can just see gwyneth here:

boho_babe · 26-10-2005

and:

boho_babe · 26-10-2005

does anyone else think that Stella is kind of challening Kate's style here:

lovelynessa · 26-10-2005

I'm not big at all and I work out all the time, and I live in Spanx. Nothing to be embarrassed about. They are the best undergarments to wear with a clingy dress. My husband just told me the other day that he wished they made spanx for men. :-)

26-10-2005	#885
lovelynessa windowshopping Profile: Posts: 17	I'm not big at all and I work out all the time, and I live in Spanx. Nothing to be embarrassed about. They are the best undergarments to wear with a clingy dress. My husband just told me the other day that he wished they made spanx for men. :-) Last edited by lovelynessa : 26-10-2005 at 02:12 PM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

25-10-2005	#871
Fabulyss fashion elite Profile: Location: soon to be London Gender: femme Posts: 2,907	^Good God, I just realized what a loser I must sound like to defend a celebrity over something like this.

25-10-2005	#873
Fabulyss fashion elite Profile: Location: soon to be London Gender: femme Posts: 2,907	Good point

26-10-2005	#874
boho_babe Cinematic Vision Profile: Location: Yorkshire, England Gender: femme Posts: 10,615	A DOSE of Stella McCartney style never did anyone any harm, and last night H&M was riding high on her wave. To celebrate the launch of her new, one-off collection for the label, that is bound to cause shopping riots when it arrives in store next month, London's most fabulous convened in an old school, St Olaves, on Tooley Street for a party that was well worth the hype. Kate Moss may not have made it – Italian model Mariacarla Boscono has replaced her as the face of the exclusive line – but Gwyneth Paltrow more than made up for it. "I really liked the whole collection," she told us. "You must write that, I want Stella to read it. If I could only have one piece I'd buy the short sleeved black satin jacket." The show, during which the models played musical chairs as bouncers stole back-to-back chairs in the centre of the catwalk until just two girls were left to fight over the winning attention spot (the mint green silk dress won in the end, despite the model falling on the floor after her contender pulled the chair away), had just the right balance of Stella's sense of humour and stylish charm. There were baggy, silky trousers drawn in at the ankle, low-waisted dresses, satin dungarees and even a budget version of her sexy tie-above-the-knee boots. Gwyneth's black jacket caused quite a stir ( Jasmine Guinness wanted it, too, as well as a sparkly embroidered cardigan), while tuxedo-style coats and tulip-skirted trench coats were all recognisably Stella – so, for that matter were the strictly vegetarian canapés, washed down by plenty of Champagne for a crowd aware that they were witness to a true fashion moment. As Gwyneth battled through the crowd to her car after the show, tailed by a train of paparazzi, fireworks lit the sky above the "Stella McCartney for H&M"-shaped box hedge outside and the high street once again made a play for high fashion's limelight. (October 26 2005, AM) from vogue

26-10-2005	#876
thehepburn backstage pass Profile: Posts: 535	Paltrow's breasts are normal and natural which means that yes, they are slighty droopy and she needs to wear a bra like everyone else. The fact that she doesnt and she is wearing something see-thru (like she has many times before) offends me because I really dont want to see her boobies.

26-10-2005	#877
skim_hazelnut_latte tfs star Profile: Location: Sydney, Australia Gender: femme Posts: 1,485	Gwyneth at Stella McCartney's H&M launch (hello magazine)

26-10-2005	#878
ShannonMc rising star Profile: Posts: 116	Frockradar - what she's wearing are called Spanx, they're just meant to hold your tummy in and trim your hips/thighs. I'm sure she didn't think the dress would be see-through, I'd be embarrassed to be caught in those things

26-10-2005	#880
michele front row Profile: Location: USA Gender: femme Posts: 200	Why should she feel embarassed about wearing spanx? She isn't the only woman in the world to wear them...plus, it should make us heavier women feel better about ourselves, especially if we look up to someone as thin as Gwyneth. Her butt is pretty big in that one photo. Where did it come from, all of the sudden?

26-10-2005	#881
boho_babe Cinematic Vision Profile: Location: Yorkshire, England Gender: femme Posts: 10,615	from vogue.com

26-10-2005	#882
boho_babe Cinematic Vision Profile: Location: Yorkshire, England Gender: femme Posts: 10,615	you can just see gwyneth here:

26-10-2005	#883
boho_babe Cinematic Vision Profile: Location: Yorkshire, England Gender: femme Posts: 10,615	and:

26-10-2005	#884
boho_babe Cinematic Vision Profile: Location: Yorkshire, England Gender: femme Posts: 10,615	does anyone else think that Stella is kind of challening Kate's style here: