How to Join
the Fashion Spot / Supporting Cast / Femmes
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Rules Links Mobile How to Join
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
11-06-2013
  46
V.I.P.
 
Bigmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Gender: homme
Posts: 8,036
Galor & Steve Madden Mag launch party, June 10, 2013



galoremag.com

  Reply With Quote
 
11-06-2013
  47
rising star
 
Lovelly1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Gender: femme
Posts: 155
I think Emily is very pretty, but I'm glad that I didn't have to be the first person to mention that she's more of a glamour or men's magazine model.

She has a great body for swimwear and lingerie modeling. That said I think she's more Frederick's of Hollywood than Victoria's Secret.

__________________
"Personality is the glitter that sends your little gleam across the footlights and the orchestra pit into that big black space where the audience is." ~Mae West
  Reply With Quote
11-06-2013
  48
V.I.P.
 
happycanadian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Gender: homme
Posts: 6,621
i feel bad, actually, because i think i started this discussion and i really don't want it to come across as "bashing" or anything negative like that. when i look back at the first page of her thread and i see my initial post -- i was VERY excited about Emily and her potential. and i think that the potential is still there. the girl has everything it takes. i don't know whether it's the work that's being offered to her or whether it's her personal taste -- but, what she's doing right now isn't going to lead to a fashion career, or even a successful commercial "sexy model" career (ie: VS, SI, Next, etc). if she works hard and only accepts quality editorial work and puts effort into changing how she's portrayed - then i think she has a shot at a great career. because, as i said - she's got what it takes, the potential is there, it's just not being used, imo.

__________________
Mark me: Rio de Janeiro will be the city of the new decade.
  Reply With Quote
11-06-2013
  49
rising star
 
Lovelly1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Gender: femme
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by happycanadian View Post
i feel bad, actually, because i think i started this discussion and i really don't want it to come across as "bashing" or anything negative like that. when i look back at the first page of her thread and i see my initial post -- i was VERY excited about Emily and her potential. and i think that the potential is still there. the girl has everything it takes. i don't know whether it's the work that's being offered to her or whether it's her personal taste -- but, what she's doing right now isn't going to lead to a fashion career, or even a successful commercial "sexy model" career (ie: VS, SI, Next, etc). if she works hard and only accepts quality editorial work and puts effort into changing how she's portrayed - then i think she has a shot at a great career. because, as i said - she's got what it takes, the potential is there, it's just not being used, imo.
Oh, no. I didn't feel like you were insulting her work. I wasn't trying to either. I'd love to look like her.

I agree that Emily has potential for other kinds of modeling. But I think she's being wasted on "low tier" modeling. I'm not sure if I'm making sense here. That's not her fault though as much as it's the fault of her agent(s) and management.

I'd like to think she'd want to do other kinds of modeling. But you might be right, maybe she does enjoy the modeling jobs she gets.

__________________
"Personality is the glitter that sends your little gleam across the footlights and the orchestra pit into that big black space where the audience is." ~Mae West

Last edited by Lovelly1; 11-06-2013 at 04:45 PM.
  Reply With Quote
11-06-2013
  50
front row
 
ChillChaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Gender: femme
Posts: 223
I didn't think anyone was insulting her when labeling her as "trashy" either. With the kind of editorial work and music vids she's done, what else can you say?
And I also agree with you guys about typical VS girls: they all have amazing bodies but there's an inherent "sweetness" to their image. They are more "cheerleader" sexy versus "Terry Richardson" sexy (Just wait till he gets his hands on her. EEK!)

But I do still see that kind of potential in her, though. Maybe her agency will successfully steer her in the right direction.


Last edited by ChillChaser; 11-06-2013 at 05:29 PM.
  Reply With Quote
11-06-2013
  51
front row
 
MissLimaVzla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
Gender: femme
Posts: 440
^ You just said it right.

Marisa Miller for example, she was loved by most of male population in the planet because she has the dream body. But she also has this girl next door attitude, like you would want to be her friend and hang out with her and it will be fun. But Emily has an attitude (well not attitude but her work does) that makes you feel like she's going to steal your boyfriend/husband lol

I don't think anyone is bashing her, we all agree that she's beautiful and has potential but she (or her agency) are making choices that are not doing her any favors.

  Reply With Quote
13-06-2013
  52
rising star
 
Lovelly1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Gender: femme
Posts: 155
We all seem to be in agreement that her management should be doing a better job in promoting her. I'd like to see her do high profile assignments.

  Reply With Quote
15-06-2013
  53
V.I.P.
 
Bigmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Gender: homme
Posts: 8,036
Quote:
@emrata looking hot in the #shrimptop shot by Andrew Kuykendall #refbabe


instagram reformation

  Reply With Quote
15-06-2013
  54
rising star
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Gender: homme
Posts: 149
If she meets Terry a Purple Fashion cover-story would not sound far fetched. Seems like an obvious choice really (and I'd like to see it happen).

  Reply With Quote
19-06-2013
  55
windowshopping
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12
There's no harm in saying it. She does look trashy and she agrees to trashy shoots. Trashy meaning solely to titillate. Her recent Chris Heads shoot especially, with her blowing smoke out of her mouth wearing a baseball hat.

Not that I mind one bit she's so willing to show off that perfect body of hers especially now that it's still young and perfect...just saying

  Reply With Quote
23-06-2013
  56
V.I.P.
 
Bigmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Gender: homme
Posts: 8,036
Quote:
From yesterday's shoot in Malibu, here is a little sneak peek


facebook Emily Ratajkowski

  Reply With Quote
23-06-2013
  57
V.I.P.
 
happycanadian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Gender: homme
Posts: 6,621
she looks a lot like Penelope Cruz in those latest candids. really pretty!

__________________
Mark me: Rio de Janeiro will be the city of the new decade.
  Reply With Quote
23-06-2013
  58
rising star
 
Lovelly1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Gender: femme
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by maynard View Post
There's no harm in saying it. She does look trashy and she agrees to trashy shoots. Trashy meaning solely to titillate. Her recent Chris Heads shoot especially, with her blowing smoke out of her mouth wearing a baseball hat.

Not that I mind one bit she's so willing to show off that perfect body of hers especially now that it's still young and perfect...just saying
Why don't you tell us how you really feel?

__________________
"Personality is the glitter that sends your little gleam across the footlights and the orchestra pit into that big black space where the audience is." ~Mae West
  Reply With Quote
25-06-2013
  59
V.I.P.
 
Bigmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Gender: homme
Posts: 8,036
Quote:
On the beach in Malibu. Not feeling the humidity in NYC today, June 24, 2013


facebook Emily Ratajkowski

  Reply With Quote
28-06-2013
  60
V.I.P.
 
Bigmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Gender: homme
Posts: 8,036
In Paris june 27 and after Ann Demeulemeester show in Paris, June 28, 2013



Video link:

http://instagram.com/p/bEeCQ1oJwX/#

fashionising.com/instagram facehunter

  Reply With Quote
Reply
Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Tags
emily, ratajkowski
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"


 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 AM.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
TheFashionSpot.com is a property of TotallyHer Media, LLC, an Evolve Media LLC company. ©2014 All rights reserved.