Kate Moss : ( March 2006 - January 2009 )

[cestmagique]

Originally Posted by haute femme

Kate already channeled her in the Missoni ads!! Come on, no more channeling. Let's have more "natural beauty" Kate editorials.

late reaction, but I agree 100%. everywhere you turn, it's "Kate as so-and-so." quite obnoxious!

[pandinha]

Originally Posted by ladyflash

Thanks for the new candids, people. Looks like we all got a bit behind when the thread was down! Kate's style is going back up to dizzy heights again

the world seems a bit better now

[iluvjeisa]

Originally Posted by cestmagique

late reaction, but I agree 100%. everywhere you turn, it's "Kate as so-and-so." quite obnoxious!

lol, well most of the time when they don't advertise that it's a channeling editorial, or when it's not a reference to one of the 5 widely known style icons, you can be sure that the photographers, editors and stylists are still referring to something but most people wont see it. Not a big deal, it's just in the nature of fashion, in the nature of any cultural expression for that matter First ed which Kate did, which I've seen, aside from the Face eds, is an ed in Italian Vogue (92) where she's "playing" Keith Richards - and three other girls are representing the other stonesies (although I think Brian Jones was missing).

[Lola Montès]

I love this new thread!
New eds by Sorenti for vogue Italy are simpply amazing.
I'm so happy to see Kate's last pics - I've been living without internet for 2 weeks and this forum missed me soooo much!!!!

[larien]

hey look at post57 how cute lila is trying to hide her face but i think she has to be accustomed to see paparazis around her.what a pity that beatiful baby doll

[*AndoraStar*]

Originally Posted by Halcyon

I'm glad we're back, but why did it take four days for the mods to just start a new thread?

How about you PM a supporting cast moderator personally?

[ladyflash]

I think that article about Harpers Bazaar was just written by a dumb journalist who didn't do their research and somehow mistaked Gemma Ward for Kate.

I somehow doubt Bazaar would do two Bardot editorials straight after each other, or that Kate would do a Bardot-inspired shoot so soon after a Marilyn one.

[caryanne]

candids from katemossfan.com/forum
I'm not sure when they are from they look very recent and I don't think they have been posted yet

[kitsch]

I love those patent leather flats Kate always wears. Designer, anyone?

[nanker_phledge]

Repetto or Lanvin I think.

[Styx]

Originally Posted by kitsch

I love those patent leather flats Kate always wears. Designer, anyone?

me too! I've been looking for something similar for a while

[lemeray]

OOhhhh Im so happy I know how to access Bruno Press now!

I looked through and saw some Ive never seen...

842.jpg

840.jpg

841.jpg

838.jpg

[talahinasky]

Originally Posted by kitsch

I love those patent leather flats Kate always wears. Designer, anyone?

if they are the ballet flats, i believe they are from "french sole" or "london sole"

[cestmagique]

Originally Posted by iluvjeisa

lol, well most of the time when they don't advertise that it's a channeling editorial, or when it's not a reference to one of the 5 widely known style icons, you can be sure that the photographers, editors and stylists are still referring to something but most people wont see it. Not a big deal, it's just in the nature of fashion, in the nature of any cultural expression for that matter First ed which Kate did, which I've seen, aside from the Face eds, is an ed in Italian Vogue (92) where she's "playing" Keith Richards - and three other girls are representing the other stonesies (although I think Brian Jones was missing).

I agree; and how true that everything simply draws upon what came before it. Nothing inherently wrong with that; it's quite fun to give a nod to an earlier decade or star on occasion. Sometimes, though, for whatever irrational reason it gets slightly irritating to hear magazines and fashion trumpet how modern and forward thinking they are when very little is ever really new and fresh, it is all an old idea with a new spin or a new editor deciding they just adore it all of a sudden. And at times it seems forced for a magazine to take on a classic movie or star and rehash them; the old magic is lost, you know? It just doesn't seem like a proper-- or authentic-- tribute. (lol, kind of like on Gilmore Girls how they used to make every pop culture reference possible fit into those 40 minutes.) Kate is Kate, none other; it is always more interesting for me to see her as her, with her own face and hair and personality, than as someone else.

As a side note, I've always seen more Bardot than Marilyn in her; hell, I've never seen Marilyn in her!

[boho_babe]

#125 Thanks for these, do you have a username for bruno because I thought it was a private site now?