How to Join
the Fashion Spot / Front Row / Designers and Collections
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Rules Links Mobile How to Join
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
08-03-2010
  61
®
 
IAmLordZen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Manila
Gender: homme
Posts: 8,663
Quote:
Originally Posted by isa.b.elle. View Post
^^^ no the house has confirmed that Lohan has nothing to do with this collection. and honestly, i don't see a lot of difference...
Indeed. At least with Lohan they could have some excuse.

__________________
THE MAGAZINE STAND tumblr
  Reply With Quote
 
08-03-2010
  62
fashion insider
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Gender: homme
Posts: 2,007
I honestly liked the first collection better. At least it wasn't as boring as this.

  Reply With Quote
08-03-2010
  63
Looking Up
 
Squizree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Gender: homme
Posts: 18,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by disco54 View Post
nicole phelps on style.com pretty much slaughtered this collection and out right said this designer is not upto the job OUUUCH!
To be honest she let Archs off pretty easily.

  Reply With Quote
08-03-2010
  64
rising star
 
Join Date: May 2006
Gender: femme
Posts: 131
Not feeling the silk/ shiny materials. Of course, if this is about putting on a little shift and hopping from scene to scene, I understand. But it seems to lack depth.

  Reply With Quote
08-03-2010
  65
scenester
 
Crisalida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Argentina
Gender: femme
Posts: 86
This is kind of better than last season, but it still looks tacky and cheap and they can't blame it on lindsay now.

  Reply With Quote
09-03-2010
  66
Mr. Magic
 
Flashbang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Gender: homme
Posts: 101,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAmLordZen View Post
Indeed. At least with Lohan they could have some excuse.
Exactly!

__________________
Our existence is not worthy without your presence. Join the fun!

(IT'S GOING DOWN
)
MENS Runway Model Showlists - Mens RTW S/S 2015
  Reply With Quote
09-03-2010
  67
fashion insider
 
Zazie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: dans le metro
Gender: femme
Posts: 2,095
I am sympathetic to Archs - how do you do Ungaro without making it colorful, frilly, ruche-y, dressy, etc. in a season of black jackets/coats and minimalism?

  Reply With Quote
09-03-2010
  68
front row
 
neonsprinkles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NYC
Gender: homme
Posts: 256
Better than the collection with Lindsey's touch....but not strong enough in comparison with other designers this season. Some of the looks are a bit dated. The texture on the pink dress is very nice...that's all...

  Reply With Quote
11-03-2010
  69
no tom ford, no thanks.
 
mikeijames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: closer than you think.
Gender: homme
Posts: 5,900
i'm sorry, but there exist those in this world who would've praised this collection even if it were roped off plastic waste bags as long as lindsay lohan had nothing to do with it. there also exist those who'd decry this selfsame collection if they thought she lent her hand to the endeavor.

seriously, this collection shows only a marginal improvement on last season and that's mostly on account of the TIME allowed for this collection compared to the lack thereof for the last. this collection had no spirit. it has nothing to say. as i suspected, estrella archs bore much of the responsibility of the lackluster quality from the last collection and it shows in this collection.

there exists more personality in one pair of shoes from last season than in this entire collection. they could just reproduce clothes from the archive and save themselves some money.

__________________
everything is never quite enough.
  Reply With Quote
11-03-2010
  70
scenester
 
Plisskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Terrè de Änge
Gender: femme
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeijames View Post
i'm sorry, but there exist those in this world who would've praised this collection even if it were roped off plastic waste bags as long as lindsay lohan had nothing to do with it. there also exist those who'd decry this selfsame collection if they thought she lent her hand to the endeavor.

seriously, this collection shows only a marginal improvement on last season and that's mostly on account of the TIME allowed for this collection compared to the lack thereof for the last. this collection had no spirit. it has nothing to say. as i suspected, estrella archs bore much of the responsibility of the lackluster quality from the last collection and it shows in this collection.

there exists more personality in one pair of shoes from last season than in this entire collection. they could just reproduce clothes from the archive and save themselves some money.
Cosign. Exactly what I was thinking. Seeing this collection makes me believe last season's was mainly burned at the stake due to Lohan supposedly being an artistic adviser. It makes you wonder how much creative control she actually did have since judging from this season, which she is not involved, to last season's theirs not much of a difference. In fact it's quite a down grade. Someone mentioned it is high priced mall clothes? Indeed.

__________________
mystylle.livejournal.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Tags
1011, emanuel, f or w, paris, ungaro
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"


 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 PM.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
TheFashionSpot.com is a property of TotallyHer Media, LLC, an Evolve Media LLC company. ©2014 All rights reserved.