Only seems like yesterday since Kate's last UK Harper's Bazaar cover and it feels like I've seen similar before. Having said that I think the subscribers looks marginally better than the newsstand cover because it isn't as faded out and the red is a bit much. There's no doubting Kate looks good but I for one can only think the OTT airbrushing and clever use of lighting have contributed to this. As for the review, it doesn't excite me, think I'll be calling it time with this magazine once my subscription ends, it's all becoming somewhat mundane. Just my opinion.
Here's Tracey's cover, not the best shot at all but you get the jist..
Kate's editorial is rather similar to the cover shots on the whole, black and white and poses don't vary too much, although she gains a cigarette hanging out of her mouth for quite a few shots, including the full length one. I don't know why I don't like it, I don't see the need for it to be there? It's not like it enhances any of her shots.