10-09-2008
|
#1 |
|
don't look down
 
|
UK Tatler October 2008 : Gemma Arterton
As reported in the Daily Mail last week, here's new Bond girl Gemma Arterton on the October cover, first shot from tatler.co.uk, edit image from dailymail.co.uk
__________________
Futurology isn't what it used to be. |
|
|
|
10-09-2008
|
#2 |
|
V.I.P.
|
ugh ugly cover
|
|
|
|
10-09-2008
|
#3 |
|
V.I.P.
|
Oh hell NO!
|
|
|
|
10-09-2008
|
#5 |
|
trendsetter
|
I have to admit I never heard of her before but Is that a Bond Girl?
 |
|
|
|
10-09-2008
|
#7 | |
|
V.I.P.
|
Quote:
 but that cover is a mess, whoever styled this needs to be fired, her haircut in contrast to that dress?The definitive no! |
|
|
|
|
10-09-2008
|
#8 |
|
front row
|
and i also saw her in St Trinians,she looked good, but this cover is a mess.
__________________
LARA STONE |
|
|
|
10-09-2008
|
#9 |
|
glossy & torn
|
I've seen other pics of her that looked good. Miss D is right though... the hair definitely doesn't work with that dress. Who is she wearing on the cover?
__________________
She's got everything she needs, she's an artist she don't look back. She can take the dark out of the nighttime, and paint the daytime black. |
|
|
|
11-09-2008
|
#10 |
|
front row
|
Why would anyone want to be a Bond Girl?? They all go the way of the cassette recorder, even Halle didn't escape unscathed.
|
|
|
|
11-09-2008
|
#11 |
|
V.I.P.
|
Whoa...I saw her pics before and she does NOT look like this. I can't believe this styling went through. She looks like a WAG.
|
|
|
|
11-09-2008
|
#13 |
|
front row
|
^ what's a wag???
|
|
|
|
11-09-2008
|
#14 |
|
V.I.P.
|
^^WAG is a moniker that UK press came up with for footaballers wives and girlfriends.
|
|
|
|
11-09-2008
|
#15 |
|
trendsetter
|
What a dreadful cover! But I can't blame them, Gemma is really, really ugly! And yes, she does look like a WAG LOL!
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
her hair is horrible
at WAG 
Linear Mode
