15-10-2007
|
#46 |
|
scenester
 
|
the buyer's cover I meant. The subscribers cover (which fortunately I will be receiving) is much better.
|
|
|
|
15-10-2007
|
#47 |
|
don't look down
 
|
We all know that it'll sell, that isn't in contention - but that fact isn't fuel for discussion. For me, what's worth posting is why we don't like it and what we would have done as editor in an ideal world for this supposedly special issue.
__________________
Futurology isn't what it used to be. |
|
|
|
15-10-2007
|
#48 |
|
V.I.P.
|
Oooh well i have to say i REALLY like the subscriber's cover.Thats a beautiful shoot of her,and no sight of their usual text,rejoice.
__________________
“We don’t call them shoots here. We don’t shoot people. It’s really a love affair.” - Irving Penn |
|
|
|
15-10-2007
|
#49 |
|
V.I.P.
|
I love the subscribers cover!
__________________
"Who knew this supposedly blank generation of Sashas, Lilys, and Cocos had it in them to act up like a bunch of old-school supermodels?" -Sarah Mower- |
|
|
|
15-10-2007
|
#50 |
|
V.I.P.
|
Such a disappoitment, the cover...but I want to see what is inside!
__________________
BITING THE HAND THAT FEEDS |
|
|
|
15-10-2007
|
#51 |
|
tfs star
|
I will never get Aniston's appeal (or why her face sells so many magazines)
__________________
Catherine-Freja-Victoriya-Siri-Toni-Ymre-Katrin-Kinga |
|
|
|
15-10-2007
|
#52 |
|
V.I.P.
|
granted, the subscribers cover does look better, but this, it's like a promotion for her not for 140 years of harpers bazaar....
__________________
"he waited for other people to understand what he was doing, instead of doing what they wanted. Balenciaga never compromised." |
|
|
|
15-10-2007
|
#53 | |
|
Light without flames
|
Quote:
 I can only agree |
|
|
|
|
15-10-2007
|
#54 |
|
don't be hatin'
|
i like the subscribers cover...and it would have been a nice cover for any of the summer months...
but not for a milestone such as this... it should have models, it should be in the vein of the design and photography that harpers bazaar is known for... it should NOT be a celebrity, i don't care what celebrity it is... |
|
|
|
15-10-2007
|
#55 | |
|
backstage pass
|
Quote:
__________________
jenniferaniston. mariskahargitay. victoriabeckham. dariawerbowy.
|
|
|
|
|
15-10-2007
|
#56 |
|
trendsetter
|
I love jennifer aniston! I love her smile!
But I have to say that she almost has never had a great cover. Back to this issue, the subscribers cover is waaaaaay better. A surprised choice for this special issue, though.
__________________
kiss in the rain
|
|
|
|
15-10-2007
|
#57 |
|
V.I.P.
|
I don't mind Jennifer gracing this particular cover, personally. The truth is, she's a fine representation of our current times, our fascination with celebrities. In 10, 20, or even 40 years, people will look to this cover for a glance at what we were interested in during the year 2007. Of course, not everyone likes Jennifer, but a large majority of people show a slight interest in her, and that's enough for Harper's Bazaar.
__________________
|
|
|
|
16-10-2007
|
#58 |
|
tfs star
|
The subscribers' cover is so much better. The regular cover looks like every other picture we've ever seen of her.
|
|
|
|
16-10-2007
|
#59 |
|
V.I.P.
|
She looks SO good on the subscriber's cover.
|
|
|
|
17-10-2007
|
#60 |
|
front row
|
i just bought this issue, it's on newsstands already in LA!
the cover's terrible but the editorials are amazing; there's a retrospective of fashion for each decade with sasha p, gemma, tanya d, freja, and lily d; an "american idol" spoof with amber valletta; an edit with chanel iman wearing several designers' looks; and a gorgeous couture spread with stam and snejana.
__________________
http://ashleyheaton.wordpress.com |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
