US Harper's Bazaar March 2011 : Kim Kardashian by Terry Richardson - Page 2

ForChicSake · 09-02-2011

and it keeps getting worse that ed is beyond ridiculous

and i complained about nicole kidman last month, i take that back whole heartedly!

thankyouhon · 09-02-2011

Are magazines that desperate to sell? I wouldn't be surprised if we see her on Vogue US soon.

clo · 09-02-2011

To be perfectly honest I've gone past beyond caring who's on the cover of US Bazaar. As long as they keep up with their great editorial content I'm happy. Kim's editorial is totally tacky, I must say, though. How can they produce such a brilliant editorial with Nicole Kidman one month and then this, the next? It surely beats me.

nenv · 09-02-2011

what can i saw? it is just eewwwwww

Gary101 · 09-02-2011

There is such a large pool of actresses that could have been used that are popular at the moment like Jennifer Lawrence, Mila Kunis, Olivia Wilde, Zoe Saldana, Anna Paquin, Rebecca Hall, Emily Blunt. Yet they put this botoxed creature on the cover? Kim Kardashian represents everything that is wrong with fame these days.

All new low for Harper's Bazaar. Its only a matter of time before Lauren Conrad, Teen Moms and the cast of Jersey Shore are on the cover. Most of them have been featured in the mag already though...

Bank · 09-02-2011

Quote:

Originally Posted by IAmLordZen

how kim gets saddled with fashion magazines is beyond me. she isn't very particularly well known outside America and she rarely does something other than promote and talk about herself -- all her incessant prattle about 'empowering women' by being plus size and her endless complaints about posing naked but she goes ahead and does it anyway. aren't her 15 minutes up already? pleasssseeee!

Good job she's on an American magazine cover then...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary101

There is such a large pool of actresses that could have been used that are popular at the moment like Jennifer Lawrence, Mila Kunis, Olivia Wilde, Zoe Saldana, Anna Paquin, Rebecca Hall, Emily Blunt. Yet they put this botoxed creature on the cover?

Kim will sell way more issues than any of those girls could.

KKnardi · 09-02-2011

looks like a christmas cover, but I like it anyways, anything Christmas is ok except during Christmas time...

honeycombchild · 09-02-2011

Quote:

Originally Posted by thankyouhon

Are magazines that desperate to sell? I wouldn't be surprised if we see her on Vogue US soon.

Of course they are? They are a business after all. No-one's doing it solely for the fun and joy of fashion really.

I don't feel particular hate for Kim, but I certainly don't care for her. I'll still buy the issue, but I have no interest in reading her article or seeing any images from that awful editorial again. But I get why she's on there. Sales figures for the March issue. It was pretty widely known that GaGa had Vogue so they had to go with someone they felt could sell well for them too.

ALAUU · 09-02-2011

Oh hell no. Although I do have to admit, she looks great as Cleopatra.

Fiercification · 09-02-2011

Blah...she's hot and Terry can go interesting even for Bazaar but this looks tamer than the cover of 'Good Housekeeping' or something.

That Cleopatra close-up is just a joke too...

tanii94 · 09-02-2011

Can someone just fire Glenda already? First Miley, now Kim. Who's next? Snooki?

MicheleIman · 09-02-2011

I am so upset!!! They could have styled Kim completely different!!! What in the world is going on at Bazaar? Did everyone agree that they didn't want their most important issue to sell? I'm soooo lost

tarsha · 09-02-2011

Bigger cover

justjared

dfl-001 · 09-02-2011

Quote:

Originally Posted by tanii94

Can someone just fire Glenda already? First Miley, now Kim. Who's next? Snooki?

With my deranged sense of humor... I would LOVE a Snookie cover after this.

Northern Star · 09-02-2011

The cover is nice enough I suppose, and Kim looks pretty, but I have just about given up with this magazine. Everything about it had gone seriously downhill and then some. I can't even be arsed to look at the contents anymore, and having Kim on the cover has just about knocked the nail in the coffin for me. She is so uninteresting.

FAQ	Calendar	Search	Today's Posts	Mark Forums Read	Rules	Links	Mobile	How to Join

09-02-2011	22
KKnardi V.I.P. Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: NYC Gender: homme Posts: 4,477	looks like a christmas cover, but I like it anyways, anything Christmas is ok except during Christmas time... __________________ BLOG

09-02-2011	27
MicheleIman V.I.P. Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: New York Gender: femme Posts: 4,171	I am so upset!!! They could have styled Kim completely different!!! What in the world is going on at Bazaar? Did everyone agree that they didn't want their most important issue to sell? I'm soooo lost __________________ twitter.com/TheUrbanNomad Instagram: @bohoelle http://www.the-urbannomad.blogspot.comBohemian & Indie Fashion

09-02-2011	30
Northern Star French Chic Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: UK Gender: homme Posts: 15,919	The cover is nice enough I suppose, and Kim looks pretty, but I have just about given up with this magazine. Everything about it had gone seriously downhill and then some. I can't even be arsed to look at the contents anymore, and having Kim on the cover has just about knocked the nail in the coffin for me. She is so uninteresting. __________________ 'Our lives are made up exclusively of what we are wise enough to keep in our hearts, and of what we are brave enough to throw away'

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-02-2011	16
ForChicSake V.I.P. Join Date: Feb 2009 Gender: femme Posts: 12,732	and it keeps getting worse that ed is beyond ridiculous and i complained about nicole kidman last month, i take that back whole heartedly!

09-02-2011	17
thankyouhon scenester Join Date: Oct 2010 Gender: femme Posts: 81	Are magazines that desperate to sell? I wouldn't be surprised if we see her on Vogue US soon.

09-02-2011	18
clo V.I.P. Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Portugal Gender: femme Posts: 4,711	To be perfectly honest I've gone past beyond caring who's on the cover of US Bazaar. As long as they keep up with their great editorial content I'm happy. Kim's editorial is totally tacky, I must say, though. How can they produce such a brilliant editorial with Nicole Kidman one month and then this, the next? It surely beats me.

09-02-2011	19
nenv tfs star Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Ukraine Gender: femme Posts: 1,680	what can i saw? it is just eewwwwww

09-02-2011	20
Gary101 backstage pass Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Ireland Gender: homme Posts: 951	There is such a large pool of actresses that could have been used that are popular at the moment like Jennifer Lawrence, Mila Kunis, Olivia Wilde, Zoe Saldana, Anna Paquin, Rebecca Hall, Emily Blunt. Yet they put this botoxed creature on the cover? Kim Kardashian represents everything that is wrong with fame these days. All new low for Harper's Bazaar. Its only a matter of time before Lauren Conrad, Teen Moms and the cast of Jersey Shore are on the cover. Most of them have been featured in the mag already though... Last edited by Gary101; 09-02-2011 at 10:17 AM.

09-02-2011	24
ALAUU fashion icon Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: New York Gender: femme Posts: 3,212	Oh hell no. Although I do have to admit, she looks great as Cleopatra.

09-02-2011	25
Fiercification V.I.P. Join Date: Apr 2008 Gender: homme Posts: 4,224	Blah...she's hot and Terry can go interesting even for Bazaar but this looks tamer than the cover of 'Good Housekeeping' or something. That Cleopatra close-up is just a joke too...

09-02-2011	26
tanii94 V.I.P. Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Where the mountains meet the sea..♥ Gender: femme Posts: 5,644	Can someone just fire Glenda already? First Miley, now Kim. Who's next? Snooki?

09-02-2011	28
tarsha V.I.P. Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Tbilisi Gender: homme Posts: 17,866	Bigger cover justjared