US Harper's Bazaar March 2011 : Kim Kardashian by Terry Richardson

tarsha · 09-02-2011

people

MON · 09-02-2011

Oh gosh it looks like the cover of Cristina Hendricks! But amazingly, Kim looks good herself! The smile is appealing!

ForChicSake · 09-02-2011

this magazine just died

are they really selling that badly?

cottonmouth13 · 09-02-2011

I love Kim but this is just...ARGH!

tigerrouge · 09-02-2011

This is a person I would not expect to turn up on a March cover, yet somehow it makes sense to see her there, in terms of the magazine that US Bazaar has become.
Posted via Mobile Device

tarsha · 09-02-2011

harpersbazaar.com

vogue28 · 09-02-2011

I see Kourtney Kardashian, rather than Kim. The whole Cleopatra thing does nothing for me, although I guess Kim's perfect for it. If only the fourth shot was the cover. Then at least it would stray away from Christina's November 2010 cover.

Bertrando3 · 09-02-2011

When I saw the title IMMEDIATELY I was like "this is gonna be ugly" but the cover is nice actually but the editorial is so sooo baaaaaaaaad at such a point that it's not even funny!

Bertrando3 · 09-02-2011

Quote:

Originally Posted by tigerrouge

This is a person I would not expect to turn up on a March cover, yet somehow it makes sense to see her there, in terms of the magazine that US Bazaar has become.
Posted via Mobile Device

totally yep.

**saann** · 09-02-2011

This is too similar to Hendricks cover for me to appreciate. And Kim Kardashan? I guess they will do anything to sell copies these days.

loladonna · 09-02-2011

Kim's editorial looks like a series of her twitpics.

tarsha · 09-02-2011

That's bad but I think we all know what to expect from Bazaar, the fact that makes this magazine worse is that, the content, which was really good in this magazine isn't that good as it was like this time of last year, for example. Last year's March issue had so many great editorials, I hope there's improvement in this month.

After reading Glenda Bailey's latest interview, I guess we shouldn't expect improved covers soon...

tigerrouge · 09-02-2011

Yes, I found that the previous issue had particularly weak content, despite using a good number of newer models. I can happily get past a bland cover if there are moments inside to make up for it.
Posted via Mobile Device

IAmLordZen · 09-02-2011

how kim gets saddled with fashion magazines is beyond me. she isn't very particularly well known outside America and she rarely does something other than promote and talk about herself -- all her incessant prattle about 'empowering women' by being plus size and her endless complaints about posing naked but she goes ahead and does it anyway. aren't her 15 minutes up already? pleasssseeee!

and one more thing, i read the people.com article and it's surprising that kim's the one doing the interview, not vice versa. and with liz taylor no less. they're talking about life's superficialities and taylor's career... which is as is should be because there's no career to talk about when it comes kim.

the editorial's all sorts of messed up too. totally contrived, totally heaux poses. Bazaar has sunk so low my neck is painful from craning down looking at it.

thiago:) · 09-02-2011

at least her breasts don't look huge.

FAQ	Calendar	Search	Today's Posts	Mark Forums Read	Rules	Links	Mobile	How to Join

09-02-2011	1
tarsha V.I.P. Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Tbilisi Gender: homme Posts: 17,866	US Harper's Bazaar March 2011 : Kim Kardashian by Terry Richardson people
Status: Online

09-02-2011	8
Bertrando3 fashion insider Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Madrid Gender: homme Posts: 2,297	When I saw the title IMMEDIATELY I was like "this is gonna be ugly" but the cover is nice actually but the editorial is so sooo baaaaaaaaad at such a point that it's not even funny! __________________ C 시원한 KOREA high fashion magazine
Status: Online

09-02-2011	12
tarsha V.I.P. Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Tbilisi Gender: homme Posts: 17,866	That's bad but I think we all know what to expect from Bazaar, the fact that makes this magazine worse is that, the content, which was really good in this magazine isn't that good as it was like this time of last year, for example. Last year's March issue had so many great editorials, I hope there's improvement in this month. After reading Glenda Bailey's latest interview, I guess we shouldn't expect improved covers soon...
Status: Online

09-02-2011	14
IAmLordZen ® Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Manila Gender: homme Posts: 8,633	how kim gets saddled with fashion magazines is beyond me. she isn't very particularly well known outside America and she rarely does something other than promote and talk about herself -- all her incessant prattle about 'empowering women' by being plus size and her endless complaints about posing naked but she goes ahead and does it anyway. aren't her 15 minutes up already? pleasssseeee! and one more thing, i read the people.com article and it's surprising that kim's the one doing the interview, not vice versa. and with liz taylor no less. they're talking about life's superficialities and taylor's career... which is as is should be because there's no career to talk about when it comes kim. the editorial's all sorts of messed up too. totally contrived, totally heaux poses. Bazaar has sunk so low my neck is painful from craning down looking at it. __________________ THE MAGAZINE STAND tumblr

09-02-2011	2
MON V.I.P. Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Philippines Gender: homme Posts: 5,922	Oh gosh it looks like the cover of Cristina Hendricks! But amazingly, Kim looks good herself! The smile is appealing! __________________ TWITTER: @monxx \| INSTAGRAM: mondimac

09-02-2011	3
ForChicSake V.I.P. Join Date: Feb 2009 Gender: femme Posts: 12,623	this magazine just died are they really selling that badly?

09-02-2011	4
cottonmouth13 V.I.P. Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Vladimir Ivanov's Bedroom Gender: homme Posts: 5,498	I love Kim but this is just...ARGH! __________________ Twitter: @juddttorres

09-02-2011	5
tigerrouge don't look down Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Béal Feirste Gender: femme Posts: 10,979	This is a person I would not expect to turn up on a March cover, yet somehow it makes sense to see her there, in terms of the magazine that US Bazaar has become. Posted via Mobile Device

09-02-2011	7
vogue28 V.I.P. Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: England Gender: homme Posts: 15,765	I see Kourtney Kardashian, rather than Kim. The whole Cleopatra thing does nothing for me, although I guess Kim's perfect for it. If only the fourth shot was the cover. Then at least it would stray away from Christina's November 2010 cover. __________________ .

09-02-2011	10
saann I don't know Mod Squad Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Gender: femme Posts: 6,046	This is too similar to Hendricks cover for me to appreciate. And Kim Kardashan? I guess they will do anything to sell copies these days.

09-02-2011	11
loladonna fashion elite Join Date: Jul 2008 Gender: femme Posts: 2,787	Kim's editorial looks like a series of her twitpics.

09-02-2011	15
thiago:) she's got the look Join Date: Nov 2007 Gender: homme Posts: 5,328	at least her breasts don't look huge. __________________ *

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode