US Harper's Bazaar March 2011 : Kim Kardashian by Terry Richardson

[tarsha]

people

[MON]

Oh gosh it looks like the cover of Cristina Hendricks! But amazingly, Kim looks good herself! The smile is appealing!

[ForChicSake]

this magazine just died are they really selling that badly?

[cottonmouth13]

I love Kim but this is just...ARGH!

[tigerrouge]

This is a person I would not expect to turn up on a March cover, yet somehow it makes sense to see her there, in terms of the magazine that US Bazaar has become.
Posted via Mobile Device

[tarsha]

harpersbazaar.com

[vogue28]

I see Kourtney Kardashian, rather than Kim. The whole Cleopatra thing does nothing for me, although I guess Kim's perfect for it. If only the fourth shot was the cover. Then at least it would stray away from Christina's November 2010 cover.

[Bertrando3]

When I saw the title IMMEDIATELY I was like "this is gonna be ugly" but the cover is nice actually but the editorial is so sooo baaaaaaaaad at such a point that it's not even funny!

[Bertrando3]

Originally Posted by tigerrouge

This is a person I would not expect to turn up on a March cover, yet somehow it makes sense to see her there, in terms of the magazine that US Bazaar has become.
Posted via Mobile Device

totally yep.

[saann]

This is too similar to Hendricks cover for me to appreciate. And Kim Kardashan? I guess they will do anything to sell copies these days.

[loladonna]

Kim's editorial looks like a series of her twitpics.

[tarsha]

That's bad but I think we all know what to expect from Bazaar, the fact that makes this magazine worse is that, the content, which was really good in this magazine isn't that good as it was like this time of last year, for example. Last year's March issue had so many great editorials, I hope there's improvement in this month.

After reading Glenda Bailey's latest interview, I guess we shouldn't expect improved covers soon...

[tigerrouge]

Yes, I found that the previous issue had particularly weak content, despite using a good number of newer models. I can happily get past a bland cover if there are moments inside to make up for it.
Posted via Mobile Device

[IAmLordZen]

how kim gets saddled with fashion magazines is beyond me. she isn't very particularly well known outside America and she rarely does something other than promote and talk about herself -- all her incessant prattle about 'empowering women' by being plus size and her endless complaints about posing naked but she goes ahead and does it anyway. aren't her 15 minutes up already? pleasssseeee!

and one more thing, i read the people.com article and it's surprising that kim's the one doing the interview, not vice versa. and with liz taylor no less. they're talking about life's superficialities and taylor's career... which is as is should be because there's no career to talk about when it comes kim.

the editorial's all sorts of messed up too. totally contrived, totally heaux poses. Bazaar has sunk so low my neck is painful from craning down looking at it.

[thiago:)]

at least her breasts don't look huge.