| 13-01-2011 | |
|
V.I.P.
 
|
Boring!
__________________
Anja Rubik,Isabeli Fontana,Natasha Poly |
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
V.I.P.
|
this cover is really good, couldn't care less for the cover star but it's a good shot
|
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
trendsetter
|
Wow..this is an all time low for them. Can't believe they put her on the cover. I'm speechless. Was hoping it was all a bad rumor.
|
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
V.I.P.
|
I can't stand this girl, but the cover looks good actually, love what she is wearing
|
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
fashion insider
|
It's a complete SH...crap, but she's wearing proenza totall looks sooo, love it (only th clothes she can go to hell for me)
|
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
you soft and only
|
The cover's ok, nothing really special. I don't care for Kristen, but I am still glad they are putting different people on their covers.
|
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | ||
|
V.I.P.
|
Quote:
 why?. I'm not a fan either but I'm really curious why some are finding it hard to cope with this cover?, I mean, she's an actress.. she's everywhere, she has a slightly distinctive red-carpet style from what I've seen, she's allegedly dating a popular actor and has been featured in serious films (Twilight Saga excluded).. add to this the fact that this is US Vogue.. gone are the days when US Vogue only featured remarkable actresses or successful faces of the modeling industry, I really don't see how Kristen Stewart somehow lowers this more than a cover featuring Jennifer Aniston (who at one point had similar credentials to Kristen and currently plays only shadow of that), or Sienna Miller (who only had the popular boyfriend and wardrobe on her side).. or worse, Melanie Knauss.. who had none of that and actually portrayed more the pre-historic woman that married for money, was beautiful and didn't matter whether she had a brain or not.Sorry if this sounds dense, the reactions when this was posted got me thinking.  I feel like when it comes to US Vogue or Vogue Paris, sometimes people really lose sight of the current standards and judge based on a reputation of a magazine and an industry that do not exist anymore. Last edited by MulletProof; 13-01-2011 at 05:47 PM. |
|
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
Alluring
|
She always looks so uncomfortable, I don't recall seeing a good picture of her.
__________________
dreams, jazz and minimalism
|
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
backstage pass
|
Her body language is stiff as usual, but her face is soft and lovely.
|
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
trendsetter
|
Clearer cover pic:
 ontd It's a nice cover with the celebrity I like so I'm satisfied 
__________________
Anna Maria Jagodzinska & Monika 'Jac' Jagaciak
|
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
The future is stupid
|
She looks so fresh & natural here. And she's always a bit quirky, which I find quite endearing. She deserves this.
__________________
making america great again |
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
front row
|
dont like the cover very much, but i do like her hair and makeup. excited to see the review...
(and why is she only wearing proenza in her cover and editorial??) Last edited by holaloha; 13-01-2011 at 06:07 PM. |
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | ||
|
V.I.P.
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
backstage pass
|
How awful
|
|
|
| 13-01-2011 | |
|
tfs star
|
They really want to increase sales do they.
|
|
|
Linear Mode
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
AdChoices