Catherine Middleton?? They're so effin pretentious.
It's like everyone at US Vogue thinks a great deal of their own importance!
This is typical half-a$$ed US Vogue fare.
Honestly, Kristen could do so much better if she'd put some effort into it.
She always looks so damn peeved and bored in her photos. It makes me peeved and bored with her.
I'm really not into actresses getting covers instead of models, but I find Kirsten very pretty and model-like here. Prettier than a lot of today's top models. Totally agree with MulletProof on the Jennifer Aniston comment.
Her editorial, on the other hand, looks sort of... tame.
Thank you US Vogue for having a different actress on your cover and not the same old Cate/Kate/Nicole/Sienna/etc. Am I the only one who appreciates this? And could people stop with the "boring" comments? This is US Vogue, not Interview or Vogue Italia. Anyways, Kristen looks amazing on the cover and her editorial looks promising too.
kate moss • lara stone • saskia de brauw
arthur gosse • benjamin eidem • clément chabernaud • simone nobili
I like it! At least, the cover and the shots are very Vogue-worthy. I know this is different but Vogue is still all about business and I believe this is a very smart business move. She looks great as well!