US Vogue February 2013 : Rooney Mara by David Sims - Page 6

**saann** · 14-01-2013

Love her, the cover and the editorial. Especially the first shot.

Just don't understand why the color scheme is the same as her previous cover.. grey background again?

Miss Dalloway · 14-01-2013

This is one of the worst US Vogue covers i have ever seen, that is not her best angle, i mean even her whole face is not in the frame, and the close up doesnt work for her. And then there is the plain background, and all that text even more poping, just bad all around.

loladonna · 14-01-2013

Rooney's editorial has three shots from the same angle. They couldn't be bothered to have variety or a theme even?

I'm going to call that this will be the worst-selling Vogue cover of 2013. Nothing about this cover would make me want to pick it up at the newstand.

vogue28 · 14-01-2013

I want to like this. I love the fact the shot is a close-up, something rare for American Vogue, so I applaud that. But I dislike how incoherent the colours of the fonts are, against the cover shot. The text is too close to Rooney's face.

**iluvjeisa** · 14-01-2013

I think the cover is fantastic. It's subtly redefining the concept of "American" at the same time as it is reminiscent of some of the early 80s covers.

GivenchyHomme · 14-01-2013

In reality she's just a Plain Jane and nothing more. Her moment has passed, it's unfortunate that she'll more than likely never be able to top The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. Anna, can we move on to more relevant and deserving actresses?

thiago:) · 14-01-2013

The shadow effect on the fonts is killing me

The cover shot looks great... So does the main editorial. I like how nonchalant it feels. However, I'm not really excited for having her on the cover. It sounds annoying complaining about that, but I really want to see Jennifer and Jessica on the cover, they definitely have a Vogue quality (if it exists

).

ChristyLeReveur · 14-01-2013

I don't hate Rooney but I don't get it... why did they use her... again?

The cover isn't good either. Plain and boring. Typical.

AbbeyRoad · 14-01-2013

*yawn*

Kagami Gen · 14-01-2013

how many pages????

alice · 14-01-2013

She looks so much more ordinary with this hairstyle. Her first US Vogue cover is better.

julien520 · 14-01-2013

this is bad really bad lifeless Anna Wintour should retire now

Rigida · 14-01-2013

I think this cover is refreshing, its so different from the usual US Vogue cover although I'm not really excited to see Rooney gracing another cover. Please give us new faces!
Posted via Mobile Device

jmrmartinho · 14-01-2013

Im so happy that it was shot by David Sims!
I love the editorial, mainly the last pic but she looks really sad (I agree, she looks more comfortable styled as Lisbeth) which is not bad but just not good for the american issue.
Imagine Jessica Chastain being the cover with an american flag, that woould make so much press after Zero Dark Thirty. But I really think they will wait to see who wins the Oscar to give the cover (should be given to both tho).

ALAUU · 14-01-2013

I knew David Sims shot this because the man cannot photograph a woman without wispy hair.

FAQ	Calendar	Search	Today's Posts	Mark Forums Read	Rules	Links	Mobile	How to Join

14-01-2013	76
saann I don't know Mod Squad Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Gender: femme Posts: 6,046	Love her, the cover and the editorial. Especially the first shot. Just don't understand why the color scheme is the same as her previous cover.. grey background again?
Status: Online

14-01-2013	78
loladonna fashion elite Join Date: Jul 2008 Gender: femme Posts: 2,785	Rooney's editorial has three shots from the same angle. They couldn't be bothered to have variety or a theme even? I'm going to call that this will be the worst-selling Vogue cover of 2013. Nothing about this cover would make me want to pick it up at the newstand. Last edited by loladonna; 14-01-2013 at 03:38 AM.

14-01-2013	79
vogue28 V.I.P. Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: England Gender: homme Posts: 15,762	I want to like this. I love the fact the shot is a close-up, something rare for American Vogue, so I applaud that. But I dislike how incoherent the colours of the fonts are, against the cover shot. The text is too close to Rooney's face. __________________ .

14-01-2013	80
iluvjeisa clever ain't wise Mod Squad Leader Join Date: Jan 2004 Gender: femme Posts: 13,607	I think the cover is fantastic. It's subtly redefining the concept of "American" at the same time as it is reminiscent of some of the early 80s covers. __________________ Beauty is a warm gun Her Famed Warm Gun
Status: Online

14-01-2013	77
Miss Dalloway V.I.P. Join Date: Mar 2006 Gender: femme Posts: 21,706	This is one of the worst US Vogue covers i have ever seen, that is not her best angle, i mean even her whole face is not in the frame, and the close up doesnt work for her. And then there is the plain background, and all that text even more poping, just bad all around.

14-01-2013	81
GivenchyHomme trendsetter Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Via Fogazzaro 36 Gender: homme Posts: 1,387	In reality she's just a Plain Jane and nothing more. Her moment has passed, it's unfortunate that she'll more than likely never be able to top The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. Anna, can we move on to more relevant and deserving actresses?

14-01-2013	82
thiago:) she's got the look Join Date: Nov 2007 Gender: homme Posts: 5,327	The shadow effect on the fonts is killing me The cover shot looks great... So does the main editorial. I like how nonchalant it feels. However, I'm not really excited for having her on the cover. It sounds annoying complaining about that, but I really want to see Jennifer and Jessica on the cover, they definitely have a Vogue quality (if it exists ). __________________ *

14-01-2013	83
ChristyLeReveur V.I.P. Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Hong Kong Gender: femme Posts: 3,660	I don't hate Rooney but I don't get it... why did they use her... again? The cover isn't good either. Plain and boring. Typical.

14-01-2013	84
AbbeyRoad fashion insider Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Philadelphia Gender: femme Posts: 2,114	yawn

14-01-2013	85
Kagami Gen windowshopping Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Beijing Gender: homme Posts: 3	how many pages????

14-01-2013	86
alice tfs star Join Date: Jul 2010 Gender: femme Posts: 1,537	She looks so much more ordinary with this hairstyle. Her first US Vogue cover is better.

14-01-2013	87
julien520 rising star Join Date: May 2006 Location: Paris FR Gender: homme Posts: 153	this is bad really bad lifeless Anna Wintour should retire now

14-01-2013	88
Rigida trendsetter Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Jakarta Gender: homme Posts: 1,038	I think this cover is refreshing, its so different from the usual US Vogue cover although I'm not really excited to see Rooney gracing another cover. Please give us new faces! Posted via Mobile Device

14-01-2013	89
jmrmartinho fashion insider Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Portugal Gender: homme Posts: 2,372	Im so happy that it was shot by David Sims! I love the editorial, mainly the last pic but she looks really sad (I agree, she looks more comfortable styled as Lisbeth) which is not bad but just not good for the american issue. Imagine Jessica Chastain being the cover with an american flag, that woould make so much press after Zero Dark Thirty. But I really think they will wait to see who wins the Oscar to give the cover (should be given to both tho). __________________ Daphne Groeneveld.Daria Strokous.Caroline Brasch Nielsen.Vanessa Axente.Julia Nobis.Kristen McMenamy

14-01-2013	90
ALAUU fashion icon Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: New York Gender: femme Posts: 3,184	I knew David Sims shot this because the man cannot photograph a woman without wispy hair.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode