| 11-04-2010 | |
|
fashion insider
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't remember those who said "such a suprise" etc coz it's soooooooooo predictable but as the user LUXXX said, Sarah sells well for Vogue and it's always a good cover with her, because even though she's an actress she's good at selling a cover and the public reacts well towards her so it's a nice cover and yeah predictable as hell when we know SATC 2 will be out soon; I actually have to confess that when I saw the trailer for this movie I was like "OH COOL SARAH WILL HAVE ANOTHER VOGUE COVER, JUST LIKE LAST YEAR WITH CHRIS FOR THE FIRST MOVIE!" and I'm glad to see I was right lol
)
__________________
C 시원한 KOREA high fashion magazine |
|
| 11-04-2010 | |
|
fashion insider
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yeah Ok kudos to her for that BUT those covers you just mentionned are really bad I mean US Vogue covers recently aren't as COOL as they were before, and it's not by having new boring people that the magazine will return to its glory. They need MODELS better yet SUPERMODELS and work harder in editorials. Tina's cover was fresh and new but Jessica
__________________
C 시원한 KOREA high fashion magazine |
|
| 11-04-2010 | |
|
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I know how you feel but Anna has to put them Celebrities or else the mag won`t sell the way it sells today. Do you think US VOGUE would sell millions and millions of copies if they put Rose Cordero on the cover. I really don`t think so. US is the land of HOLLYWOOD. And in fashion what`s important now is to sell. And sadly celebs sell globally.
__________________
TWITTER: @monxx | INSTAGRAM: mondimac
Last edited by MON; 11-04-2010 at 02:06 PM. |
|