US Vogue November 2009 : Marion, Penelope, Nicole and Kate by Annie Leibovitz

[birdyandme]

Larger image:

nkidman.com

I still love it!
If you removed the 'vogue' masthead I don't think the photo shopping would be as obvious.
Kate Hudson for me is the only let down as she does look disconnected and her facial expression is a bit strange.
But they're my only gripes.
Obviously it could have been better - so could alot of covers.
But I think it's a bit dramatic to call it 'horrendous'.

[KissMiss]

i don't even get outfitts... looks like a Vanity Fair cover that went really wrong...

[Kanna]

I thought I might like the cover if a larger image comes out.. But I still don't get it

[Miss Dalloway]

Originally Posted by birdyandme

Larger image:
nkidman.com

I still love it!
If you removed the 'vogue' masthead I don't think the photo shopping would be as obvious.
Kate Hudson for me is the only let down as she does look disconnected and her facial expression is a bit strange.
But they're my only gripes.
Obviously it could have been better - so could alot of covers.
But I think it's a bit dramatic to call it 'horrendous'.

Thanks for posting the bigger cover image. I also agree with you, dont think the cover is "horrendous".etc, Nicole looks awful, and not a fan of how Marion looks, but overall i like it, and appreciate how different it is from any of their other covers in the past years.

[McQueezy]

^I agree too, the cover could've been a lot better but it isn't the worst I've ever seen.

The only thing I really hate is that Kate looks like she's been copied and pasted, and also Nicole's face, but I don't think that can be blamed entirely on Photoshop.

[MON]

I loved the cover when it got BIGGER! Thanks for posting! Is it allowed for me to post my version of the cover (WITHOUT THE FASHIONS NIGHT OUT THING)

[surrealseven]

Originally Posted by McQueezy

and also Nicole's face, but I don't think that can be blamed entirely on Photoshop.

Yes, definitely

[sethii]

Nicole has a five o'clock shadow.

[m.j.]

this doesn't look like Vogue cover... and these ladies are older than models, they used too much photoshop...if they wanted women on the cover they should look like women. not 15 yrs old models.

[MON]

I edited the cover and cropped the text above the masthead, looks better without it.
SOURCE: nkidman.com

[Lanbim Cord]

The cover is ridiculous...
What are you doing Anna?

[cottonmouth13]

^^now that is so much better!

[McQueezy]

^It is a lot better. I never thought I'd miss the Vogue banner.

[MON]

PRIMA TIME!
Kate Hudson, Marion Cotillard, Nicole Kidman, Penelope Cruz

ONLY PHOTO FROM THE EDITORIAL

SMALL HQ COVER

SOURCE: VOGUE.COM

*Can't believe that there's only one photo!

[rechungpa]

Cover after cover = disappointment after disappointment. At first I thought it was something a child put together. I had to look twice to see that it was US vogue - horror!
A close-up of the faces and that scenery would have been more 'interesting'.
I totally agree, there are too many typo on the cover - " It's Vogue, let's drop the standard". I do not need to know every single article on the cover, I expect everything inside to do that - lastest fashion, not celebrities.