|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
24-11-2008
|
#151 |
|
front row
 |
I guess they tried to do something along the lines of the Sopia Coppolla cover??
|
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#152 |
|
V.I.P.
|
^i don't think so ...
anyway ... i may scan the MM Stéphanie tomorrow ... right now i'm too tired ... and the En Vogue pages, too ... by Géraldine Saglio. they are very good ... see you tomorrow ....  |
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#153 |
|
trendsetter
|
Love the Cover , its different but in a good way .Plus I'm a Princess Stephanie fan
|
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#154 |
|
trendsetter
|
I'll be looking foward to En Vogue and Une Fille Une Style.
I love the cover. |
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#155 |
|
V.I.P.
|
I like eds so far. Iris' is very interesting, great styling, and Suvi's looks great too, I love the second shot
__________________
|
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#156 |
|
Unveil Yourself....
|
Iris' ed is simply amazing...seriously, her cheekbones are out of this world
 And I did not realise that January's Alana was Alana Kuznetsova! I just assumed it was Zimmer...what a superb surprise  Now let's get this straight though...what is up with Liu Wen and her Solar Month? Did I miss something and do we now have 13 months? 
__________________
If it's already been done, undo it.... |
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#157 |
|
tfs star
|
i loved Iris' editorial. so 80s are not over yet? i guess it's time to commit a suicide. or two.
__________________
goodbye, Daul! |
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#158 | |
|
V.I.P.
|
Quote:
solar and lunar are for the horoscopes, aren't they ? i saw it in Elle horoscope ... i never understood what it was .... but there it's not solar month ... it's just jan. 2010 .... maybe it would be a solar month ?!  oh realized the saint names are replaced with Fashion names (Alber, Giorgio, Gisele blablabla ...) that is ridiculous .... seriously ? are we having a high school joke here ?! casting director made a mistake and took 13 for a 12 month calendar ?! not wanting to be mean .... but nobody had their complete brain on this calendar making ?!
__________________
"Something that is taking shape in my mind and will sometime come to consciousness"/ "Something which I know exists, but I cannot know if anyone else knows it" Last edited by BerlinRocks : 24-11-2008 at 05:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#159 |
|
V.I.P.
|
Why do you guys care? At least we get one extra picture
 |
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#160 |
|
Unveil Yourself....
|
It's a fashion celebrity birthday month
An extra month is nice, but when January 2010 comes, I want to have Jan 2010 on my wall not Solar 2009 
__________________
If it's already been done, undo it.... |
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#161 |
|
V.I.P.
|
I loved the Calendar! All models are great in it and I love Terry Richardson's work.
__________________
I'm just a Sweet Transvestite from Transexual, Transylvania.
|
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#162 |
|
V.I.P.
|
i love the Iris Strubegger editorial, looks gorgeous!
__________________
"he waited for other people to understand what he was doing, instead of doing what they wanted. Balenciaga never compromised." |
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#163 |
|
front row
|
you can smack suvi as much as you want for her walk, but once again she proves she can do no wrong when it comes to editorials!
|
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#164 |
|
fashion icon
|
The calendar is cool but some of the girls are not sexy enough.
Like Ali? I feel uncomfortable with her presence in this calendar. I expected something more raw and provocative of the calendar. Anna J is the only one whos turns me on out of all those shots!  I like the cover though. Very strong and simple and so loaded with subtext. I love the way shes obscured by her own pose. I'll buy this. I buy the guest edited issues of Vogue Paris each year. They're the most interesting and directional. |
|
|
|
24-11-2008
|
#165 |
|
don't look down
|
The calendar looks very similar to a 'pin-ups' one I had, illustrations from yesteryear, paintings of women in see-through underwear - and the Richardson calendar copies it right down to identical poses and props. I like that he's made it real.
The idea that Stephanie looks too tired to show her face on the cover defeats the purpose of selecting her as a cover girl. If you can't show her face, then she's "not fit for purpose". Though now that I have been given the forewarning that she looks tired, when I see the editorial, she will probably not look as bad as I imagine. But a cover without eye-contact loses a lot of its appeal - it's harder for the cover shot to form a connection with the viewer. We could intellectualise it, but at the same time, the cover is supposed to act as an instant advert for why to buy the issue, and having to appreciate the cover intellectually shows that it hasn't achieved its main aim. It's not an awful cover and it's different to what we've seen so far this year, but it doesn't fire me up and I don't think I'd treasure it for two days, never mind two months. It's not Lara's cover, it's not Anna's cover, it's not even a Kate Moss cover. Those covers connected with me (even if the latter served to irritate me more than anything, thanks to her ubiquity).
__________________
Futurology isn't what it used to be. Last edited by tigerrouge : 24-11-2008 at 06:45 PM. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
