Vogue Russia January 2010 : Natasha Poly by Sølve Sundsbø

[vogue28]

Natasha Poly by Patrick Demarchlier


source | snaps by MagFan

[AnaBGD]

I'm disappointed in the ed. It's OK, but I expected something more related to the cover image.

[tarsha]

^ Same here. I don't like the ed, thought Natasha looks good in some of them. Looking forward seeing ed in real life. Maybe it will turn out to be OK.

[kellydior]

i'm surprised that natasha's ed is devoid of movement where as the cover evoked motion. I think the main purpose of the ed was to showcase the various designer pieces w/c natasha did perfectly.

[vogue28]

I'm incredibly disappointed with Natasha's editorial as well. Don't get me wrong she has defiantly delivered, and she looks superb.
But I would of preferred an editorial with the same concept, styling and photography as the cover.
It would of had a much larger impact on the whole issue for me.

[Leeroi]

Wished Sundsbo did the editorial instead of Demarchelier, he would have given it some life. Demarchelier, for me, has always been a portrait photographer so his subjects usually just stand there.

[Carla-A]

exactly my thougth. I was waiting for an ed with the same concept that the cover, but instead of it, here are boring studio shots... Such a disappointment

[khyrk]

I agree. Sundsbo should have shot the ed as well for continuity. Not complaining about Natasha.

[fearless123]

Model: Natasha Poly
Photographer: Patrick Demarchlier




scanned in by me

[taben]

I didn't expect Natasha's ed to look like the cover considering they're shot by two different photographers and Demarchelier's work and Sundsbo's look nothing alike, but I would have liked something a bit more lively... That being said, if Vogue Russia wants to feed us a boring studio shoot I'm not unhappy that Natasha's in it, she looks stunning as usual

[j'adorekapusta]

i actually think Panos did an AMAZING job with Natasha this time, especially how he turned Escada ostrich-feathered dress upside down to emphasize the exaggerated hips. what is ironic is how Russian Vogue team thought 'stylist's studio' was some kind of label to put in credits next to Nina Ricci and Givenchy. well, should they really bother learning about Panos' habit of creating custom-made pieces in his own studio?

[*ana*]

wow judging by the cover i wasn't expecting very much from natasha's ed, i didn't pay attention to the review and the fact that it was by demarchelier and not sundsbø - which wouldn't make my expectations any higher actually, unless panos was mentioned. i love the simplicity of the makeup and hair, especially because natasha's face is strong enough to catch attention by itself, since it's quite expressive. and i love how it emphasizes the styling.

[khyrk]

Originally Posted by *ana*

wow judging by the cover i wasn't expecting very much from natasha's ed, i didn't pay attention to the review and the fact that it was by demarchelier and not sundsbø - which wouldn't make my expectations any higher actually, unless panos was mentioned. i love the simplicity of the makeup and hair, especially because natasha's face is strong enough to catch attention by itself, since it's quite expressive. and i love how it emphasizes the styling.

I agree. She has a very strong presence.

[Kanna]

Love Natasha's ed. I wasn't her fan at all but she's doing so great that I'm changing my mind..
Thanks for the pics, fearless.

[tarsha]

Изящные искусства"
Photo: Alasdair Mclellan
Style: Panos Yiapanis
Models: Hannah, Ash, Ross



elitemodel.com via Shely