Well, suddenly that Sorrenti photograph reminds me of why I never got her appeal . I hate it when they try to make someone with her *ahem* small frame "sexy".
Ah well. The brief euphoria was nice .
Oh wow, i couldnt disagree more with this comment.So only top heavy women can be sexy?How silly,she exudes sexual energy in the eds to me, and a model dosent have to have Lara's breasts to be sexy, we (women) come in different shapes and sizes.
achAT thanks alot for scanning all the eds, you are a darling.
Last edited by Miss Dalloway; 27-06-2008 at 09:56 AM.
Oh wow, i couldnt disagree more with this comment.So only top heavy women can be sexy?How silly,she exudes sexual energy in the eds to me, and a model dosent have to have Lara's breasts to appear sexy, we (women) come in different shapes and sizes.
achAT thanks alot for scanning all the eds, you are a darling.
Would people please stop ascribing opinions to me I never espoused in this thread ?
I never posted that nudity = sexy
I never posted anything about boobs.
I was deliberately ambiguous because of forum rules but I really don't think that gives you enough reason to pick imaginary opinions out of thin air. You could just PM if you really want to know .
(I don't even like Lara Stone (as a model).)
__________________
We love you Haiti! We are with you.
Last edited by Bahiyya; 27-06-2008 at 10:01 AM.
Reason: fine tuning diction
^^You need to relax, i didnt attack you i simply replied to your comment the way i got it,and you said that it was ambigious so isnt it expected that people didnt get what you mean?We are not mind readers you know!
I thought you were reffering to her breasts, but it dosent matter really, the same thing applies imo for her body shape but yes we shouldnt get into it since there is no "weight" discussion allowed here.
Last edited by Miss Dalloway; 27-06-2008 at 10:10 AM.
It's just the second time someone misinterpreted my comments so I did my best to be clear. I was vague but not in a manner that would lead reasonably anyone to the conclusions a couple of posters came to.(Unless "small frame" = "boobs" in some language? I know that not everyone is an English speaker.) And it seemed a little patronizing when you told me that women have different shapes and sizes. (No! When did that happen? )
No one is supposed to find all things about all persons sexy in order to be "fair". That would make me dishonest and others dictatorial . It's something I hold in direct relation to Ms. Poly rather than to all persons like her in general, in any case. Vlada had that water ed, I think, in the last Numero? Similar body but in some shots I think she managed to carry it off. With Poly photographers tend to have her stretching and reaching all over the place which just accentuates what I don't like . I certainly don't think you silly for appreciating her sexual energy .
well i think this issue is a knock-out even though Natasha doesn't seem to be that iconic (comparing to Natalia Vodianova or Sasha P), still kudos to Vogue Russia for celebrating these girls, i do think they deserve it. i just hope (and i'm pretty sure about that) this won't come out the same vain and over-hyped version of idolizing a model as it happened to Aggy's issue of i-D.
Russian Vogue is very much about this fairy tale of an ordinary Russian girl from Nowhere who was too brave and hard-working not to become a star. i think that's really positive and something very few people care about, creating a right image, a right message. Good work, La Doletskaya!