07-02-2008
|
#226 |
|
trendsetter
 
|
^ i agree, i count a kate moss cover as a 'celebrity' cover. that said i think she looks great on this months cover, way better than some others of her more recent uk vogue efforts.
__________________
check out my NEW fashion blog! KILLKILLKILL |
|
|
|
07-02-2008
|
#227 |
|
boo
|
I'm tired of seeing Kate everywhere
 |
|
|
|
08-02-2008
|
#228 |
|
front row
|
oh words cant express how much i love kates new(ish) fringe...
 |
|
|
|
08-02-2008
|
#229 |
|
tfs star
|
wow and here the moment came when kate got old.
__________________
goodbye, Daul! |
|
|
|
22-02-2008
|
#230 |
|
backstage pass
|
wow,craig mcdean did one awesome job. anyone know how to create those light rays (k.moss ed)? and don't you come up w/ photoshop
__________________
OH::BONDAGE::UP::YOURS
|
|
|
|
22-02-2008
|
#232 |
|
V.I.P.
|
i love this issue.
__________________
Natasha. Kate. Anna S. Daria. Malgosia. Raquel. Snejana. Maryna. Lily D. Edita.
Les Addiction |
|
|
|
23-02-2008
|
#233 |
|
don't look down
|
Going through issues of UK Vogue from ten years ago, there's a world of difference between the magazine then and now, both in terms of range of content, but also in how committed it was to being exciting - in those days, we got covers with Kate Moss cheekily almost-nude and cracking a huge grin, but in 2008 we get Kate looking comatose behind a fringe.
__________________
Futurology isn't what it used to be. |
|
|
|
23-02-2008
|
#234 | |
|
Signed, sealed, botheled
|
Quote:
__________________
What can be shown, cannot be said. |
|
|
|
|
05-03-2008
|
#235 |
|
backstage pass
|
I just saw this at Borders today and flipped through it. True, there are a lot of ads but I loved the Lily and Daria ed so much after viewing on here that I'm going back tomorrow to get it
 |
|
|
|
06-03-2008
|
#236 |
|
rising star
|
Are we not due a new issue yet? It feels like forever!
__________________
Shop windows, sunglasses, spoons....Some days there just aren't enough reflective surfaces. |
|
|
|
28-03-2008
|
#237 |
|
don't look down
|
A postscript to this issue - today I got a letter from Conde Nast, telling me that this issue "completely sold out".
The background to this is that I subscribed well before the March issue was due to come out, and received a letter telling me that my subscription would commence with that issue, but the month came and went and no magazine appeared. I was always meaning to get round to calling them up to complain, but it seems they were on the case regardless. Blah, blah, blah. I've never heard of an issue selling out before, and I am a little sceptical, seeing as there are always a few issues kicking around the newsstand at the very end of each month's "cycle". But it seems this issue has been immensely popular, regardless of how we might feel about Kate becoming boring. Though it does also suggest that subscribers come a low second to every other means of distributing the magazine. Good job I bought an issue anyway.
__________________
Futurology isn't what it used to be. |
|
|
|
28-03-2008
|
#238 |
|
V.I.P.
|
^^That is awful,that you didnt get it!There is no excuse for that, and as for the issue being sold out i dont have hard time beliving that since Kate always sells (a fact)and thats why they use her so many times.
__________________
“We don’t call them shoots here. We don’t shoot people. It’s really a love affair.” - Irving Penn |
|
|
|
28-03-2008
|
#239 |
|
it's a long story...
|
Daphne Guinness looks so good, two pages back.
__________________
the lines are fading in my kingdom... |
|
|
|
28-03-2008
|
#240 |
|
don't look down
|
At least I got Victoria's UK Vogue cover on time, that was the one I was really waiting for - and they adjusted it so that I get an extra month at the end, so a happy ending for everyone.
Now I just have to get on to them about the Lily Allen issue of UK Glamour that never arrived...
__________________
Futurology isn't what it used to be. |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
