i just LOVE the idea of a lipstick named Addict though..for some reason!
i don't really like it and hfgl pointed this out about the recent fragrance ad Catherine McNeil did but why are they (whoever is behind the creative directing, i guess?) having the models hold what they are selling now? it's kind of redundant...or maybe redundant isn't the right word but i can't think right now for a better synonym but anyone get what i'm saying? I mean, i'm sure Maryna's already wearing it
I think they already have a few lipsticks named addict: Dior Addict High Shine, Dior Addict High Color, Dior Addict Ultra Shine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mchunu<3
i don't really like it and hfgl pointed this out about the recent fragrance ad Catherine McNeil did but why are they (whoever is behind the creative directing, i guess?) having the models hold what they are selling now? it's kind of redundant...or maybe redundant isn't the right word but i can't think right now for a better synonym but anyone get what i'm saying? I mean, i'm sure Maryna's already wearing it
I know exactly what you mean. They could have just placed the product in the ad, but having the model holding the product is pushing the boundary a little bit too much... makes it almost feel kind of cheap.