How to Join
the Fashion Spot / Visualizing Fashion / Ad Campaigns
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Rules Links Mobile How to Join
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
19-12-2005
  61
trendsetter
 
Jadee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: France\ London
Gender: femme
Posts: 1,234
Lindsay won't be the new face of Chanel
From Oh no they didn't

Quote:
I e-mailed Chanel corporate with my opinion that Lindsay Lohan didn't really fit the Chanel image, she's too young, too unsophisticated. Got an e-mail back this morning from Chanel saying that Lindsay Lohan WAS NOT chosen to represent Chanel, so is this a confirmed thing or just hopeful rumor on Lindsay's part, like when she said she was chosen to be the female lead in Mission Impossible III?
http://thebosh.com/archives/2005/12/...lobes_more.php

  Reply With Quote
 
19-12-2005
  62
barack the vote
 
cutxpaste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston
Gender: femme
Posts: 9,951
^ Yippee!

  Reply With Quote
20-12-2005
  63
fashion insider
 
funkalicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Singapore
Gender: homme
Posts: 2,203
Good God!

Lindsay's legs could rival and elephants in that blue pic.

__________________
.AliMichael.AliceGibb.BrunaTenorio.CocoRocha.DaulKim.HyePark.IekelineStange.JourdanDunn.
.KarlieKloss.MackenzieHamilton.MeghanCollison.SheilaMarquez.SimonaMcIntyre.SiriTollerød.
  Reply With Quote
20-12-2005
  64
princely
 
yourbestfriend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Gender: homme
Posts: 13,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemiu
I thought Selma Balir was the new face for Chanel?
Selma did their line of eyeglasses.

  Reply With Quote
23-12-2005
  65
trendsetter
 
madem0iselle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canada
Gender: femme
Posts: 1,275
i dont think lindsay will suit donig chanel campaigns..she just innt the type i guess someone like alessandra ambrosio would fit it more someone sopphiscated not someone...dirty? anddd i dont know! LOLS

  Reply With Quote
27-12-2005
  66
etre soi-meme
 
Lena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: europe
Gender: femme
Posts: 23,965
i strongly believe this is just a rumour, that maybe started from their pic together.. so lets wait till this is confirmed, his use of selma for the eyewear ads was bad enough..

  Reply With Quote
05-01-2006
  67
V.I.P.
 
style_savy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Gender: femme
Posts: 34,896
After seeing her Vanity Fair shoot I think she could pull off some lovely Chanel ads.

__________________
~Follow me on Instagram~
  Reply With Quote
05-01-2006
  68
trendsetter
 
madem0iselle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canada
Gender: femme
Posts: 1,275
how come i think she looks bad on the VF magazine =S

  Reply With Quote
05-01-2006
  69
barack the vote
 
cutxpaste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston
Gender: femme
Posts: 9,951
^ Didn't she says she's bulimic in the VF article?

__________________
____________
READ MY BLOG
last.fm
  Reply With Quote
06-01-2006
  70
V.I.P.
 
smartarse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Manhattan - New York City
Gender: femme
Posts: 5,040
Although, I'm not too thrilled with this choice, Lindsay does possess that freshness that Chanel is looking for , as well as can look the part , not to mention the many publicities she made for herself in 2005.

It's good to be a movie star, huh? lol

__________________
Head Over Heels
CaraDelevingne.JoanSmalls.ToniGarrn.KarmenPedaru.Sigrid.Selezneva.ChiaraBas chetti.
  Reply With Quote
07-01-2006
  71
front row
 
Taper-Jean Girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York City--Where thrills are cheap, and love's divine...
Gender: femme
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by fashionista-ta
Presumably he's using Selma & Lindsay to go after that market segment for Chanel ... they apparently have the money, why should they be spending it somewhere else? And now that Chanel has its cosmetics available online, perhaps he's hoping this age group will be good online customers. With Lindsay he's appealing to anyone who came from the wrong side of the tracks but now has some $$$$ ... perhaps also a somewhat untapped market for Chanel??
Hey! I resent that. Why is Lindsay from the 'wrong side of the tracks?' Because her family is working-class? Okay, so I guess that means someone with wealth is from the 'right side of the tracks'? Sooo Paris Hilton would be a suitable replacement for Kate Moss? I think it all comes down to the fact that there is no right or wrong side of the 'tracks' and money cannot buy class! I'm from a South Carolinian middle-class family and I have more class in my bicuspids than Paris has in her over-sexed body!

ps- please dont see this as some sort of thumbs up on my behalf for Lindsay representing Chanel. I think its a WRETCHED idea!

__________________
"I'll be prancin' around in my high heels and your cherry-red lipstick..."
  Reply With Quote
07-01-2006
  72
V.I.P.
 
snowqueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Gender: femme
Posts: 6,321
*pinches self to wake up from this horrid nightmare* its all going to be so gastly ... cries why oh why ??

  Reply With Quote
08-01-2006
  73
front row
 
Taper-Jean Girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York City--Where thrills are cheap, and love's divine...
Gender: femme
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by cutxpaste
^ Didn't she says she's bulimic in the VF article?

well no big surprise there! What kills me about celebs is that they are perpetually LYING. Everyone knew Lindsay had an ED and drug problem in 2004, and the fact that she would sit and say "Oooh no, I lost weight with a personal trainer!" Is an insult to everyone's intelligence No, Lilo, no personal trainer is gonna work you until you look emaciated. And then she timidly says she's "experimented with drugs" okay, experimenting is my trying an X tablet while and Amsterdam and spending the rest of the night puking, at her level experimenting probably implies slaving over a laboratory of drugs, trying to develop a more potent high! I just honestly don't see why she went down that route. She's actually talented, she doesn't need to be a twig starlet. Most of the 'skinnies' in Holywood don't have talent! (i.e. Mischa, Nicole, Paris, Kimberly... ) I only hope she learns and grows from this and gets better!

__________________
"I'll be prancin' around in my high heels and your cherry-red lipstick..."
  Reply With Quote
08-01-2006
  74
windowshopping
 
eliza_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montreal
Gender: femme
Posts: 9
haha well..now that shes put a few pounds back on and gone back to dark hair, she doesn't look so bad. I was quite surprised by the choice, i'll admit, but hey Lagerfield doesn't always go the people expect him to go, so this shouldn't be sucha surprise..maybe he knows something we dont hmm?

  Reply With Quote
08-01-2006
  75
etre soi-meme
 
Lena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: europe
Gender: femme
Posts: 23,965
the more i think about it, the more this thread belongs to fashion daily
sounds like science fiction, Chanel will never need LL to promote their brand

  Reply With Quote
Reply
Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Tags
chanel, lohan, represent, rumour
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"


 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
TheFashionSpot.com is a property of TotallyHer Media, LLC, an Evolve Media LLC company. ©2014 All rights reserved.