|
|
#646 |
|
don't look down
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think that Denim for Men ad was made in the days before anyone wore a condom.
__________________
Futurology isn't what it used to be. |
|
|
|
|
#647 |
|
Shady
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here's my problem with the Tom Ford ad. It's not the breasts, pose, sweat....anything like that. It's the total lack of anything that's actually sexy. It's blatant, cheesy and not even mildly erotic, which, coming from Tom Ford, is a huge problem in my book.
It just looks tacky, very Penthouse magazine, not provocative. It almost looks like someone trying to be Tom Ford and failing miserably. Sidenote, I'm fairly certain that the image was actually shot by Marilyn Minter, not Terry Richardson.
__________________
We’re all fascinated with corruption, the more glamorous the better - Rick Owens my blog; updated Oct 4th - random musings of a fashion fiend Last edited by Spike413 : 07-09-2007 at 07:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#648 | |
|
fashion icon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#649 |
|
trendsetter
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
^ hahaha i am in canada when i saw it... it was like a split second and you can hardly tell what is really going on....
back to the tom ford thread, i dont find it too offensive, but it is disgusting cheap, old style and tacky..... it is even worse when they objectize a women in such way (omg tom ford can do waaayyyyy better then this!)
__________________
pm me for facebook's e-mail Last edited by jjbunny79 : 08-09-2007 at 01:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#650 |
|
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
this Tom Ford ad is boring.... but Tom seems to know this kind of things still work (sadly) without even being published... Do you think it will be published??? in Purple or SelfService... but in Vogue?? maybe Vogue Paris...
the boobs look weird, non? but it's funny... a branlette espagnole with a perfume... ...it's really porn... no more porno chic or whatever... it's just porn... Wear my perfume and your wife (mistress, gf etc.) will agree for a branlette espagnole... ![]() ![]() Do you think it would work???![]() Actually the thing that disturb me (not really... but a little) is the open mouth... I think this is what could shock most... I let you imagine... young ppl on this forum... no need to explain... |
|
|
|
|
#651 | |
|
trendsetter
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Some find it ugly - that's undestandable. Some find it bad taste - still understandable. But offensive? How? For the thoughts it makes us have? Well, who is to blame then ![]() I guess the level of explicitness is what bothers people. I personally never thought this ad would cause so much discussion, even though it's so porn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#652 | |
|
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
everything is shown... the perfume (masculine sex), the boobs with the perfume btw (the action = branlette espagnole / spanish wank???).... the open mouth (the end of the act, the boy pleasure... need more explanation, about it???) you wanted the perfume exploding in the girl's mouth??? that wouldn't be tom Ford... but really Terry Richardson... think as a feminist, and you'll find the shock... A woman is used to sell for men... + on the picture, she's the "object" giving pleasure to the man, and it makes men think they can give pleasure like this to a woman... that makes sense, it's not complicated... it's a simple message...
__________________
"Something that is taking shape in my mind and will sometime come to consciousness"/ "Something which I know exists, but I cannot know if anyone else knows it" Last edited by BerlinRocks : 09-09-2007 at 02:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#653 |
|
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#654 | |
|
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Less talk. More Barack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#655 | |
|
Signed, sealed, botheled
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
The problem, again, is that the woman doesn't look like she's getting any pleasure...of anything...except protein shots ![]()
__________________
What can be shown, cannot be said. Last edited by iluvjeisa : 09-09-2007 at 04:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#656 | |
|
trendsetter
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
One question though: what makes you think a man can't give pleasure to a woman like this? |
|
|
|
|
|
#657 |
|
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
^
![]() ![]() ....as a gay, I cannot imagine myself doing this... but maybe some women get pleasure with this... I don't know... |
|
|
|
|
#658 |
|
rising star
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I guess standards, norms and culture aside, what makes it so awful is that it is specifically designed to shock. But it is so badly done it makes it crass. Every time I look at it I think 'Trainwreck'.
And what makes it offensive/insulting? Tom Ford thinking that men looking at this ad would be interested in the perfume ![]() Last edited by chrisss : 10-09-2007 at 11:42 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#659 | |
|
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Less talk. More Barack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#660 |
|
trendsetter
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
When you give pleasure to your partner, you feel good too, non? The woman on the picture seems pretty hot to me
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|