15-01-2011 | |
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
kk #26
![]() frida #14 ![]() natasha poly # 12 ![]() joan #8 ![]() good for constance #6 ![]() eniko #7 woww
__________________
Anja Rubik,Isabeli Fontana,Natasha Poly |
15-01-2011 | |
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Last edited by rockangel; 15-01-2011 at 12:28 PM. |
15-01-2011 | |
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
good for anja at No 2, the only one i care in the top 5.
__________________
Anja Rubik,Isabeli Fontana,Natasha Poly |
15-01-2011 | |
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wow, finally a list that places Lindsey where she really deserves. Thanks for the effort rock,
![]() |
15-01-2011 | |
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Since I had some spare time I made some rankings ![]() First I wanted to know which agency had the most models in the actual Top-75. Agencies Top 5: IMG: ll (2) Next: ll (2) Marilyn: l (1) Top 10: IMG: llll (4) Marilyn: llll (4) Next: ll (2) Top 20: IMG llll-l (6) Marilyn llll (4) Next lll (3) Women lll (3) DNA: ll (2) Elite: l (1) Ford: l (1) Top 50: IMG llll-llll-llll (14) Women llll-llll-l (11) Next llll- (5) Ford: llll- (5) Marilyn llll (4) DNA: llll (4) Elite: lll (3) New York Models: ll (2) Trump: l (1) Supreme: l (1) Top 75: IMG llll-llll-llll-lll (18) Women llll-llll-llll-ll (17) DNA: llll-llll (9) Next llll-lll (8) Elite: llll-ll (7) Ford: llll-l (6) Marilyn llll (4) New York Models: lll (3) Trump: l (1) Supreme: l (1) Request: l (1) Fun facts
Then I wanted to know how accurate the Models.com rankings really were. ![]() Models.com Girls that are in the actual top 50 who don’t have a spot on the MDC Top-50 or icons list.
Girls that are in the MDC Top-50 that aren’t in the actual Top-75:
Overrated by MDC (29) Of course this has to be taken with a grain of salt, because MDC also takes past achievements into account, hence why Stam, Anna J, etc… are so much higher on MDC than in reality.
Underrated by MDC (11)
Accurate MDC rankings (5)
Fun facts:
|
15-01-2011 | |
tfs star
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
...dang. go Lara
![]()
__________________
"If you don't eat yourself, you will explode instead..." -Goldfrapp
|
15-01-2011 | |
!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
this seems just as inaccurate and congested as the mdc rankings
|
15-01-2011 | |
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
^
![]() |
15-01-2011 | |
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes frida should really b higher in MDC list!
__________________
Anja Rubik,Isabeli Fontana,Natasha Poly |
15-01-2011 | |
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's true Nils, thank you so much for your dedication btw... and also thanks to rockangel. I'm amazed by some of the results... I really wasn't expecting Anja at #2 and Natasha so low.. but cold hard facts are cold hard facts after all. I knew it Frida deserved to be higher.
![]() |
15-01-2011 | |
An die Freude.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
^^^ no such ranking will ever be 100% accurate. There is subjectivity on how to value runway vs. editorial vs. campaign (OG/MG), CK vs Chanel etc. etc. etc.
+ Personally I think it's necessary to take more than one season into account. But that's just me. But it's cool to have the Top 75 ranking back (even if the list is NOT more accurate than models.com). _ Last edited by candlebougie; 15-01-2011 at 04:12 PM. |
15-01-2011 | |
fashion icon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i don't know what kind of criteria are used for the ranking but seeing eniko ranks way higher than daria or natalia make me think twice about the accuracy of the ranking. i dont remember eniko scores any major ad (or just ad) this season, while natalie and daria on the other hand have tonnes(guerlain, lancome, salvatore, stefanel, etam, joseph, the list just go on and on).
if u used walking the catwalk as a criteria then it is INVALID to compare daria or natalia to eniko bc these girls dont walk(they just do a few shows here and there). i dotn remember eniko has scored any MAJOR covers(fashion bibles: french vogue, vogue italia, or vogue us). french vogue is 10 times more prestige than something like vogue korea or vogue spain or vogue turkey. anyway, my point is that models like daria and natalia dont belong to this ranking. quantity is important so does quality. an only girl ed in us vogue is 10 times more prestige than an ed in vogue korea or numero tokyo bc the fan base for vogue us is huge compared to vogue korea, or etc. i find the top 4 to be accurate but the rest is questionable/arguable. |
15-01-2011 | |
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
At the end it will ALWAYS be impossible to make everybody 100% happy with the results... so
![]() Last edited by Legolas; 15-01-2011 at 04:23 PM. |
15-01-2011 | |
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yay Lara
|
15-01-2011 | |
V.I.P.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes no everybody will b happy!
but thanks to rockangel for doing the list!
__________________
Anja Rubik,Isabeli Fontana,Natasha Poly |