W September 2011 : Kristen Stewart by Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott
http://i.imgur.com/kOnrA.jpg
http://rkloving.tumblr.com/post/8798643976/kristen-stewart-w-magazine-cover-dont-forget A better look at the cover... |
She looks like Lindsay Lohan.
|
woooow! so 60s .so natalie wood or liz taylor!
|
Absolutely stunning. She looks like a feline. It's nice to see her as a bombshell because she's usually a tomboy.
|
I don't care about Kristen or Robert Pattinson or Twilight but this is a nice cover, very glamourous and I'd say something new for Kristen and the new W? Seems like she has been working on her expressions too, I've seen other shoots of her..
Very gorgeous and very soft! |
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/2193/...rtcover.th.jpg http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/2...rtcover.th.jpg http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/2...rtcover.th.jpg http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/2...rtcover.th.jpg http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/219...rtcover.th.jpg
wmagazine.com I really like it. Too bad they photoshopped the hell out of her face in the last one. |
Thank God for the photoshop, they made her look nice.
|
She's looking insanely gorgeous! :'D
|
wow I actually like a W cover, for once.
|
It doesn't look a thing like her, ergo it's lovely.
|
This is bad. I was expecting something better than this. Why did they use a headshot? She doesn't even look herself!
Posted via Mobile Device |
The cover reminds me of a classic Hollywood portrait. I've never been so happy to see such an over-photoshopped cover. It's gorgeous.
|
Wow, I actually don't hate a Kirsten Stewart-related-something. She looks great (whether it be makeup, photoshop or photography). I like the retro thing going on and she pulls it off.
|
This is probably the best over-done photoshop job ever.
|
Itīs by M&M, masters of heavy photoshop. What did you guys expect? LOL
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.