First looks in better quality
http://i.imgur.com/r3mR4.jpg http://i.imgur.com/pLbzd.jpg http://i.imgur.com/q976J.jpg http://i.imgur.com/yejwn.jpg nowfashion |
loving it so far OMG OMG!
|
And with that, we are back to the early days of Givenchy. I could not be happy. Focus is back to the design of the clothing, not gimmicks.
|
A glimpse in one single finale video: http://yfrog.com/nikzrz
|
looking at it on NowFashion and it's beautiful
|
It started great, amazing, flawless but the end was really bad...i didnt qite like it overall...
|
I love that it seems quieter, less driven by statement detailing.
I hate to say this but these first white looks reminded me of this Givenchy.. http://www.style.com/style/view/45/27/100052745.jpg [style.com] .. which is Julien MacDonald's Givenchy :lol:. I always loved that collection though, despite the reception, so if this ends in darker notes, I'll be just as pleased! |
looks amazing so far!
|
I have no words! :shock:
|
Yeahhhhhh! Perfection - Fabulous casting OMG
|
I agree with MulletProof...I love that it's a quieter collection; the cuts and other details really stand out. It's beautiful. :heart:
|
this is very good. no ugly prints, no gimmicks. i love most of it, i could do without the glitttery pieces (... ) and the leather - animalier thing. the white pieces are heavenly and i love the skirts!
|
Amazing !!
|
A very beautiful collection, with stunning shapes, sheer details and cuts but as a whole - rather, pointless looking I would say? To me it all looked like a 30 outfit beginning of a collection waiting to be edited down to 15. I didn't see evening pieces (excluding the sequined dress on MCB perhaps), nor many different styles and techniques mixed into one, it all kind of blended together. Which really bothers me, because this could've been a stunning collection had it been developed a little further.
|
This might just be my favorite show of the season!
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.