View Single Post
08-04-2006
  68
iluvjeisa
clever ain't wise
 
iluvjeisa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Gender: femme
Posts: 13,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by smartarse
Actually, Vogue US did attempt to put models on the cover few years ago and the sales were considerably down. Soooooooooooooooooooo... it's all about DEMAND and supply (versus Supply and Demand) for the American mainstream.
I'm not sure what you mean by this, really. They tried to put models back on the covers when? By the September 2004 issue? That doesn't count. It was one issue and the magazine must have weighed 2 kilos.

Otherwise let me recap:

60s, 70s, 80s: Few celeb covers (1 per year or less).
90s: 90-97 3 celebs per year
1998: 7
1999:4
2000:3
2001:5
2002:10
2003:12
2004:11
2005:11
2006:allll

They're trying to compete with the celeb mags instead of being a fashion mag. It's called trying to eat the cake and have it too, ie trying to make all the money of a celeb trash rag while retaining their status as the finest fashion mag of all.

Of course the sales were down if they don't have someone to gossip about on the cover. Big surprise there.

  Reply With Quote