View Single Post
Old 15-02-2008   #3
Spike413
Shady

Spike413's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: New York
Gender: homme
Posts: 12,770

^ I know what you mean, but in the cases of a designer item being knocked off entirely, there is no justification and the original should be copyrighted.

Artwork is, photography is, sculptures are, music is, and yet all of those things cause a trickle down effect, one artist being inspired by another. But if an artist were to actually copy a piece by another, it's a pretty black and white case, the original artist is protected.

All I can say is a very enthusiastic FINALLY. This whole issue goes back to the fact that no one regards fashion as anything more than "just clothes". Designer's work isn't taken seriously outside of a high fashion environment, and therefore knockoff artists can justify doing what they do as being strictly business. It's high time that changed.
__________________
We’re all fascinated with corruption, the more glamorous the better - Rick Owens

my blog; updated Oct 4th - random musings of a fashion fiend

Last edited by Spike413 : 15-02-2008 at 05:21 PM.