Quote:
Originally Posted by delfine
The technology is not to blame. Cameras from 50 years ago could take just as detailed pictures than todays ones . It's just that in todays multimedia mad world there is so much output but not enough talented people to do it.  |
that's the point
also today if you (are "crazy" enough to) shot large format film you got even much more detail than digital
the major difference from digital vs film is the number of shoot you can obtain, and for this reasons more image to manage more unskilled people unable to develop the photographic results properly
anyway I look stunning in photos, even (obviously digital) self portraits
I also look good in film photos, but I was a baby, it was easy to look cute
it's a fun discussion this, I saw something similar film vs digital in some photo boards circa 10-5 years ago ...
also all real people (photographers) I know that advocated film just bough their digital camera this year and this are now their main tools, probably this previoisly film people are the most unskilled to use digital cameras ... just give them time ...they will learn
