View Single Post
Old 22-07-2008   #307
tigerrouge
don't look down

tigerrouge's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: Béal Feirste
Gender: femme
Posts: 4,866
Status: Online

Quote:
Originally Posted by edwac View Post
And the issue is not the middle finger, the issue is Vogue Paris promoting cruelty.
On the issue of fur, as long as the two sides of the argument are freely available in society for people to read and consider, then it's a matter of personal choice for each person.

Peta are free to follow a policy of circus-level attention-grabbing tactics to keep the issue in people's minds, Paris Vogue are free to use fur in a fashion story. We have access to both sides, and after that, it's up to each of us.

I don't think Paris Vogue uses furs without always being aware that they're a product of putting something to death - the idea that this sensual material is seeped in blood and selfishness is often a part of the editorial 'story' or mood.

I contrast this with furs in US Vogue, which are usually presented as nothing more than another rich person's accessory.

I write the phrase 'a matter of personal choice' being fully aware that there's not much choice involved for the animals, but above, I talk in terms of people.
__________________
Futurology isn't what it used to be.