|
If it was a request to remove the images, I would wonder about why.
The advance publicity and interest generated by posting info about magazines helps to sell them.
And such advance information is also officially provided by magazines themselves to the media - it often happens that cover shots and interview snippets appear in UK newspapers a few days ahead of the arrival of a magazine on the newsstand.
If Hearst is upset that the internet might spread the news of Scarlett on the cover ahead of them publicising it themselves, they need to speed up their own PR department, not clamp down on people.
If people have received a subscribers issue, then the magazine has been officially released to people who have paid in advance to receive it.
If the complaint is about "scans" - well, everything gets scanned, old and new magazines, and scans are interesting and useful, but both the hard-core magazine lover and the person who simply wants something to look at in a spare moment, will rather buy the real thing. Sales of Bazaar to bored people waiting in bus stations will not be affected by someone posting images on tfs.
__________________
You're perfect, yes, it's true. But without me, you're only you.
|