Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Magazines' started by Flashbang, Aug 18, 2010.
what a dumb cover
i don't mind some nudity but this is just...
good cover but look more summer
Love love love, Guinevere, BUT not this cover. It belongs on Playboy.
I adore 10 magazine, and Guinevere but the result is quite disappointing. I was expecting a shot with showcased her more stoic beauty.
So this issue is completely dedicated to Guinevere? Interesting. The cover is unappealing though.
PlayBoy would do a better job
When i saw that Guinevere had a cover i was so excited to see the result since i've always liked her print work. This is a major disappointment though, not really much to say about it.
i don't like it
10 usually do pretty good covers but this one, erm... not really feeling it.
Yep, it should be placed in the same section with Playboy this month.
Wow! I can´t wait for more
i don't like it, is playboy ??
I disagree with all the playboy comments. Nudity does not automatically equal Playboy. The simple white background and composition, the placement of the frosting, the hair and makeup, and the apprehensive expression on Guinevere's face take it out of the Playboy realm.
If this was Playboy, it would have big blonde hair, cheesy velvet background, a demure expression, and just three dabs of the frosting covering her.
The fact that it is so NOT Playboy in its nudity is what I like about it. It is kinda awkward and challenging. It isn't the most aesthetically appealing cover, but that somehow makes it work.
lol! I think sometimes fashion and art takes advantage of how much nudity it can get away with and it turns tacky
I wish her body was positined differently, it would have made the cover more interesting. This is plain boring/unflattering/don't buy the magazine no matter the content- strange.
its hilarious is there any text on the cover? i hope so!
Well... at least it's Guinevere