Allure March 2012 : Kim Kardashian by Norman Jean Roy

[Gary101]

Celeb Buzz

 

[fee de foret]

that pretty much sums up my reaction to this.
the source of the gif is gifsoup. (don't know if we need to credit gifs like we do images)

 

[saann]

^the same way of crediting photos

And wow, she looks like utter sh*t. Some color would have been nice.. is this a non-makeup issue where they use natural looking make-up but claim she's make-up free?

 

[t-rex]

Washed out clothing and styling, and what are her arms doing? She looks like she's chained up in a medieval dungeon.

 

[Dora]

On family aspirations:
"Do I want kids of my own? Absolutely. But I don't know if that's what's meant for me. Maybe I'll just work, work, work, and not think about it."

On watching her life unfold on television:
"Is it tough to watch [the show]? Yeah. Tough to see an unhappy time in your life. Do I think there are more haters than before? Not really. But I think this has given them a platform to have a louder voice. Will I be more private of a person? Am I more guarded? Absolutely. But, also, I'm a firm believer that my show is who I am."

On having limits when it comes to letting the cameras into her life:
"People [think] because you film your life on a reality show, you live everything for the cameras. But we all have limits. When I saw Khloé and Lamar get married—and they had their wedding on TV—I thought, Oh, my gosh, that's so exciting! That's what I want! If you were to ask me now, that's not what I want."

On how her limitations have changed:
"[Divorce] definitely made me want to be more private with my relationship, whenever I choose to get into one again. I'm not ready, but when that time comes, I'll be more cautious about who I let my world open up to."

celebrity-gossip.net

 

[Label Basher]

My first thought was ''YUCK'' and I don't mind Kim (I'll take her over Parisite any day). I get a men's mag feel not beauty. They really missed the mark with this one.

 

[Deleted member 116957]

You know, when I read the title I wasn't too annoyed because I remember that her September 2010 cover wasn't too bad, but good grief this is just atrocious.

 

[LUXXX]

Wasn't she just on the cover of Allure...hmmm....they seem to enjoy making her look natural.

 

[kokobombon]

WTH?! She doesn´t look "natural" but sick... and again this woman? are there not any actresses out there trying to promote their movies?

Did they change the layout? somehow it looks cheaper than usual...

 

[Label Basher]

^ Look like new fonts.

and I agree about the actresses thing. Reese has a movie out right now but I don't think she's got any covers or Rachel McAdams would have been nice.

 

[Handbag Queen]

Is anyone else sick to death of this talentless broad, or is it just me??????

 

[GlamorousBoy]

oh no :-X

 

[Srdjan]

Ordinary photo...Typical Allure cover - nothing special.
I mean is she still interesting to people? Who's gonna even buy it..

 

[Northern Star]

She looks as rough as a badger's ****.

 

[MON]

Her past allure was classier and was so much better!

 

[Deleted member 1957]

i actually dont mind it she looks natural but you can still see that she has great skin and hair without th makeup

 

[gatocosmico]

if it's in march, the b-tch sells mags for shure, but why Norman? Michael thompson just said no? LOL.

 

[YourMonster]

She looks like a junkie. and all that text eating away at her face isn't helping the cover either. BOO!

 

[ForChicSake]

wtf is it with allure and this one?

 

[jal718]

Horrible!!'