Allure November 2006 : Scarlett Johansson by Michael Thompson

[moussemaker]

thanks to sammie323 for the scan!

 

[TheGlassAngel]

Well, busty and pouty as usual...

 

[liberty33r1b]

^true. i really don't like it, looks dull....

 

[L.A.Gant]

I think she looks great!! Love the long flowy hair and it beats the covers of the last few issues - Christina and Jessica, not their best at all.

 

[Erin]

Well, busty and pouty as usual...

That's for sure. Especially the busty part... but I think I maybe just need to come to terms with being jealous of her gorgeous breasts. Seriously.

I think the cover's good. I'm not the biggest fan of Scarlett, but I think she looks natural and gorgeous here.

I'm curious to what her photo spread looks like. Knowing my magazine service, I won't get this November issue until the end of October.

 

[Faith Akiyama]

Scarlett looks lovely Good to see a cover where she isn't made up to be some siren of the early 20th century

 

[kissmesweet]

The cover is pretty, perhaps in an editorial... but not that much of an eye-catching cover.

 

[katelynn]

How did they shot this cover picture? Seems like the wind was from behind.

 

[beatrice23]

Well, I think this cover is pretty gorgeous..especially her flowy hair.

 

[jjbunny79]

most of the time her bone structure does not appeal to me at all but this cover make her look soo pretty :giggle: hehehe she looks pretty in here

 

[Luxx]

It is really about time Allure moved away from these repetitive headshots.

 

[polka_dot]

I think I can safely end my Allure boycott now. Scarlett's a great actress, although she's everywhere right now.

 

[Deleted member 45369]

this is precisely why there really isn't any movie stars anymore. I mean every rising startlet is shoved down our throats as if she had had a string of blockbusters under her belt. Covers for UK Vogue, Allure, Esquire, and Flaunt may all call her a great big moviestar that harks back to the golden age of hollywood but that didn't stop the Black Dahlia or Scoop from tanking as well as the Island, or that movie with Helen Hunt, or the Ballad of what-his-face with Travolta, she's the female Colin Farrell(that fool couldn't even get people to watch his sex tape how the hell is he going to get them into movie theaters). I really can't stand when actrices do all these covers with the excuse that their promoting a movie when in reality a magazine article is never going to sell movie tickets just sell out personal lives. Take Jennifer Aniston for example she did every cover on the planet and her movies still bombed, don't any of these dumbasses realize that if someones first reaction to seeing them is "God if I see Jennifer Aniston one more time I'm going to shoot my brains out", that their not going to pay 10.00 bucks to see 2 more hrs. of them. Jennifer needs to worship the ground Vince walks on for giving her a hit, nobody has ever said, 'Gee, I think I'll go watch the new Jennifer Aniston movie" no matter how interesting that find her personal life to be. There may be plenty of celebrities but there are very few movie stars. Poeple like Jennifer and Scarlett need to start selling movie tickets instead of US weekly to move from the formal to the latter.

 

[Deleted member 45369]

P.S. Totally going off subject here does anyone think that all thos covers Drew Barrymore is doing will stop whatever movie she's "promoting" from totally bombing as well as Scarlett's movie? They all have multiple covers this month and yet I still don't know what it is they are promoting, never the less their movie will come and go but as long as they keep the mags selling they'll still be considered big movie stars regardless of actual merit, while people well spend their money on non "star" driven vehicles like Narnia, Harry Potter,
King Kong, Finding Nemo, ETC. Maybe their is such a thing as bad publicity, Too Much Plubicity.

 

[Pichichi]

good looking, thanks

 

[julesrules815]

i hear that ADC!!! I am sooo sick of seeing all the same actresses on all the mag covers! Kirsten Dunst was on so many Sep. and Oct. issues, it was ridiculous! I mean, how different could the interviews be?!?! AARGHGH!!!

 

[marylauda]

I think she looks gorgeous in that picture, and like Faith said, it's great to see her not made up to look so Old Hollywood.

 

[Annu]

bad preview scans from scarlett-fan.com

 

[peacelover142002]

^Are you sure that's not from Esquire? If not, it certainly should not be in Allure.

 

[TheGlassAngel]

Allure doesn't do photoshoots like that....if they do 'sexy', its more 'elegant sexy' or 'glamorous sexy'