They're pushing "The End of Anti-Aging" yet have dedicated thousands of pages to the topic of anti-aging products and proceedures in the past and will, undoubtedly do so in the future. This is such a hallow attempt at being woke.
And anti-aging isn't just about the face you see in the mirror, it's about how best to maintain or improve the health of your body.
If a fortysomething can adopt a lifestyle that sees their metabolic markers return to the levels they were ten or twenty years ago... in a way, they are trying to recapture or return to their youth, but for the best of reasons. And getting fit or flexible again isn't something to be ashamed about.
But when it's your face, you're suddenly supposed to feel bad about your choices.
Is sunblock an anti-aging product? Are only people who completely disregard self care suppose to be on this cover? Sharon is a great example of someone who looks amazing for her age, that having “work done” can indeed work for you. Not everyone who goes under the knife, btw, wants to look like a 20 something. This idea that you are obsessed with youth because you want to look good at 50, 60, or 70 is incredibly ageist. There’s a big difference between Sharon or Jane Fonda and Madonna and it’s not the particular procedures they may or may not have gotten.
Anja Rubik called, she wants her head back.
Why is she popping up on so many covers lately? Portuguese Vogue, Spanish Bazaar and now this. Couldn't someone give Michelle Pfeiffer a cover instead?