Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Designers and Collections' started by Bellaly, Jan 25, 2010.
looks not so flattering for me.from the first pic.
That glove is very interesting . It looks like a ballet slipper on the hands . Interesting .
Ugh, those flat shoes!
Hum, not liking...
Again, the clothes are not Haute couture. I see nothing that would require individual fitting to simply arrive at such casualness...
I really like those flat shoes!
i was just reading about this on yahoo news:
the concept is nice ...
the result isn't ...
very bad collection !!!
Finally, a simple and fun Haute-Couture collection that doesn't rely on overbearing make up and contrived silhouettes to make a statement. I like the wearability factor, the simplicity with a touch of detail work.
Is this really Haute Couture or is she just one that shows during the 'week' of it ? I could never tell .
It just doesn't look like Couture to me. O, no.
I was just about to say that. I like the idea but it looks so disappointingly prêt-à-porter
Don't appear to me like Haute Couture neither.
** no model talk here, please. see forum guidelines for more info**
AVH please come back to us
Doesn't look like haute couture for me. This is more of a pret-a-porter or a ready to wear collection IMO. But whatever, some pieces here are plain hideous even Angelina Jolie would look ugly if she wore it. The flat shoe-like footwear that's reverbating ancient egyptian footgear looks unbelievably tacky too. UGH!
she is officially a cotourier.
i dont understant why couture needs to look a certain way or be called rtw. thats limiting these designers as artists