Armani's Sexual Offence

Discussion in 'Designers and Collections' started by Lena, May 12, 2004.

  1. Lena

    Lena etre soi-meme

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2002
    Messages:
    23,866
    Likes Received:
    0
    so glad that people are finally taking some action, better late than never

    from the Guardian UK
     
  2. seditionary

    seditionary New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2002
    Messages:
    4,375
    Likes Received:
    0
    :sick: :yuk:
    we had the times, i wish i had seen the offending advert.. it must hav not been good.. as it didnt even stick in my head
     
  3. asta

    asta New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2002
    Messages:
    1,791
    Likes Received:
    0
    i don't think that i have seen it....

    it is a shame....
     
  4. Urban Stylin

    Urban Stylin ɐʎ ʎǝɥ

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Messages:
    17,297
    Likes Received:
    19
    probably the person that did it didnt have that in mind but still they shouldnt use it.
     
  5. helena

    helena Swim Upstream

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,434
    Likes Received:
    1
    Armani isn't the only culprit - some of thse D&G adverts are shockers....
     
  6. Lena

    Lena etre soi-meme

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2002
    Messages:
    23,866
    Likes Received:
    0
    there should be visuals coming up on this,
    please do post if you find links or images from the Armani Junior ad :flower:

    and yes, i agree there are quite few child-as-sexual-object inspired,
    fashion advertisments around, i'll be glad to see them go, seems like
    the 'general public' got finaly alerted .
    hence "better late than never"

    dont feed the beasts :nuke: :boxer:
     
  7. mikeijames

    mikeijames no tom ford, no thanks.

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    5,880
    Likes Received:
    0
    as much as i am all for the hyper sexuality in mainstream adult ads, what bothers me about these children's ads is that there's an appetite for this stuff. children are maturing much faster these days and i think that a lot of these ads is a response to this new younger sexuality.
     
  8. Atelier

    Atelier Hoppity Hop

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,989
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's a tiny-ass thumbnail of it if you go to www.giorgioarmani.com. Hit your language preference and a smaller window appears. The thumbnail is the last one on the right as "Armani Junior."

    Personally I don't see the big deal about this shot in particular.
     
  9. mikeijames

    mikeijames no tom ford, no thanks.

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    5,880
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yet another useless controversy. I understand there are members in society who want to keep a check on the sexuality perceived in children's ads...but a boy shirtless is no more sexual than a diaperless baby. Come on.
     
  10. pennyfei

    pennyfei Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    0
    overreactive, definitely! But we can't ignore the fact that the moral nature of us human beings is on the decline also.
     
  11. Lena

    Lena etre soi-meme

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2002
    Messages:
    23,866
    Likes Received:
    0
    thanks for the link, but i really love to see the original advertising.
    the little picture was a bit shocking just because that young guy looks..
    far too much like a girl :blink:
     
  12. ahhGucci

    ahhGucci Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    Messages:
    6,480
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's plain wrong.
    Thats a boy??? :shock:
     
  13. Sephora_Socialite

    Sephora_Socialite Fierce Flava

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,744
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am all for not exposing children sexually, but I think this as a bit of a overreaction...I've seen many Quiksilver ads of boys in just shorts and beaded necklaces like this ad but not one complaint.

    I saw the ad in one of my papers/magazines and it was no big deal...He wasn't posed sexual or anything...like Mikeijames said..its no more sexual than a pampers commercial.
     
  14. ahhGucci

    ahhGucci Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    Messages:
    6,480
    Likes Received:
    0
    IMO, the picture was taken in a way that the boy looked like a naked girl. I just think this isn't right, the pic did look a bit dodgy, and children are innocent so lets not start a debate on that.
     
  15. Lena

    Lena etre soi-meme

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2002
    Messages:
    23,866
    Likes Received:
    0
    how can we talk without having a look at the actual advertisement :blink:
     
  16. fiction

    fiction New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    It really bothers me how they make young girls look like mini models (very thin long legs etc.). Their bodies havent developed yet and I guarentee you that when they turn 15 and start filling out the response will not be positive. I know that some people are naturally skinny and have model build but you dont know who these people are at until they are teenagers, but no one should go through childhood worrying about their weight
     
  17. Spike413

    Spike413 barcode

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    14,812
    Likes Received:
    0
    There was also the Calvin Klein scandal in the 90's. I'm wondering just how bad the Armani one's were. If they were similar to the CK one's I can see why it may be deemed offensive but I'd have to see them to judge.

    Edit-just saw the little photo, from what I see there really wasn't anything offensive about it. Does anyone have a larger picture? I totally agree with whoever it was that said it's no more sexual then a diaper ad.
     
  18. Meg

    Meg inspired contemplation

    Joined:
    May 22, 2003
    Messages:
    16,598
    Likes Received:
    0
    and I think it's not just a boy without a shirt, it's a boy being sexualized. i think it looks like he's oiled down or something. i breezed through the armani junior stuff and there were a few pics of little boys with no shirts on, and a jacket with their pants low and underwear showing. personally, it doesn't bother me but I can understand it's making a child into an adult when they clearly shouldn't be.
     
  19. softgrey

    softgrey flaunt the imperfection

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2004
    Messages:
    52,436
    Likes Received:
    51
    i just think they are bad pictures...period...they are ugly to me...bad styling...what's with the ugly necklaces...btw... :wacko: dumb idea to shoot the shirts open...trying too hard to be cool and looking stupid instead... :innocent: :ninja:
     
  20. ignitioned32

    ignitioned32 Mannikin

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    4,666
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think that it is wrong because they're trying to make the kid look like an adult.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"