Brittany Hollis | Page 2 | the Fashion Spot

Brittany Hollis

I don't mind her in #3, but she looks way too plain. Lacks spark.
 
Im actually surprised shes signed with DNA. She seems more like a model at Next, or Elite..based on her looks. Reminds me of Kasia Kniola.
 
she looks french, even though i don't know her nationality... sadly, i feel she's kinda plain too
 
model_mom said:
Does Brittany have a last name? I need to add it to her thread title to avoid confusion.
Mes excuses for adding the agency in the thread title - it's a habit when the last name is missing, filling gaps you know :doh:
:)

Based on the really simple shots I felt she was kind of below standard for DNA, plain. But then I saw those testshots with Sinclair, she's got a posing talent that convinced me :p I agree she'll need to work on her expressions though, but since she could be classified as a doll she's most probably able to pull off the most moronic looks. I must say she does it right imo... so far :ninja:
 
perlefine said:
:)

Based on the really simple shots I felt she was kind of below standard for DNA, plain. But then I saw those testshots with Sinclair, she's got a posing talent that convinced me :p I agree she'll need to work on her expressions though, but since she could be classified as a doll she's most probably able to pull off the most moronic looks. I must say she does it right imo... so far :ninja:


Were those actually test shoots ??? :shock: They looked like high fashion editorial pics, to me...
 
Some of their new girls have done a shoot with Kevin Sinclair and it didn't appear in magazines, besides, there are no text credits for the clothing on them. The Mark & Radek shoots look like real edits too no? They're tests. ^_^ Tests aren't low quality when you're with such a good agency, they do business with the best.
 
Brittany :heart:
mmpy8m.jpg


mmpyfr.jpg

*DNA models
 
She's beautiful. Reminds me of Kim Noorda, in a way, and some other recent girls, especially those Polish ones (she looks kinda Polish), but more edgy... The contrast between her light eyes and dark hair is pretty interesting...
 
The last two are fairylike, so far from contrived. She must be very easy to work with.

I'm still afraid she's only 13 :neutral::unsure:

markradek26hf.jpg

markradek48ry.jpg

[DNA]
 
perlefine said:
The last two are fairylike, so far from contrived. She must be very easy to work with.

I'm still afraid she's only 13 :neutral::unsure:
[DNA]

13? omg...soooooooo young!
but nice :flower:
 
She looks incredibly young in those pictures. I still think she is beautiful though!
 
hellscent said:
13? omg...soooooooo young!
but nice :flower:
I'm not saying she is 13 ;):p I'm just slightly frightened she turns out to be that young. I'll try to find out.
 
perlefine said:
I'm not saying she is 13 ;):p I'm just slightly frightened she turns out to be that young. I'll try to find out.

I think she is about 15....I hope!!! :p
 
She's just now 13. She needs to wait it out a couple of years please, we all know 13 year olds just wont get the cover on most days. Besides that, she looks like a "cute" 7th grade girl pulled out of a classroom.
 
Have you worked with her? I hope she manages to 'keep her head above water' till she's about 15. Why did DNA put her out there now already?
 
i like her alot! I remember seeing her at that show and wondering who it was. Now I know!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,383
Messages
15,300,251
Members
89,357
Latest member
bambi99
Back
Top