mikeijames
no tom ford, no thanks.
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2003
- Messages
- 5,879
- Reaction score
- 4
I have no words. I mean I've never really been wowed by anything Bailey has done at Burberry, but I'm honestly embarrassed for him right now. That collection, besides being completely out of touch with the zeitgeist, is also tragically bad looking.
He'd be better off sticking to his same old rainy London day formula, because this is one sad attempt at being trendy. For that matter it's a sad attempt at making clothes that just look good.
i really cannot add much to this rather astute insight, but this collection, in my mind, looked like a sales rack of balmain sprayed with silver studs. yes, the seemingly last-minute additions of neon accessories did make it tie into collections we've seen on both sides of the pond, but mostly this collection looked so out of step with EVERYTHING. will these pieces hold up and sell? of course, it's burberry. and it's not completely out of the realm of bailey's work -- i think back to that wonderfully colorful collection with the neons and neoprene some years back -- but it's just not relevant in many ways.
WITH THAT SAID, one has to give bailey his props because his pre-fall and resort collection remain the stuff of fashion junkies' dreams and it's quite genius of him to use the ready-to-wear runways as a selling opportunity: their original purpose any way. if one wants his comment on the new silhouette, his last resort collection addressed that soundly. so if one looks at this collection as just a moving sales rack, it's not altogether horrible. it also underscores the covetability of that motocross look that everyone lambasted when balmain brought it to the fore.
the diversity of lines at burberry ultimately still make it a force in fashion even if its voice during this season really means nothing.