Charlize Theron for L'Oreal Paris

[Kimkhuu]

She's the latest L'Oreal Paris model. She's doing the coloration Récital and Préférence ads.

 

[Kimkhuu]

 

[Kimkhuu]

 

[vintage_princess]

L'oreal always have famous people doing their hair ads...dont know if thats a good thing

 

[Urban Stylin]

love the 2nd. The 1st has great colours but she looks abit older

 

[chocsta]

She looks wonderful

However, I think she would look even better in a more natural shade of hair colour

 

[nycgirl84]

The first looks really good, but the last two look a bit cheesey.

 

[BCBG freak]

Ew. I do not like any of those pictures. Her hais color is AWFUL and her smile looks too staged... Like you cannot see any feeling come though.

 

[SCBlondie]

Yay! No more orange skin.

 

[PradaP]

I don't like the ads, I prefer Heather Locklear and it would suck if they replaced her with Charlize simply because she was getting older

 

[Plumour]

she looks good there, but I normally don't like L'Oreal ads

 

[Belowen]

It makes her look too old

 

[oanadobre]

It's typical for L'Oreal. Nothing special...

 

[Fujyn]

I agree it's simple, L'Oréal better made !

 

[Purr]

L'orel is such a bad brand. they must pay a lot of money otherwise I doubt an A-lister would want to sponsor it


but... charlize looks good, IMO.
she always does

 

[LMK]

She's a pretty woman but I don't like her.

She looks the same eveytime and her role in monster made me dislkie her more...I know she had to make a big transformation and acted the part well but it just bugged me...I think she just bugs me!

 

[sashatheelf]

ick, the mad her look like a stupid beauty queen or something...gross eyebrows.

but then again, shes not exactly gorgeous either.

 

[poo]

Originally posted by Purr@May 26th, 2004 - 10:02 am
L'orel is such a bad brand. they must pay a lot of money otherwise I doubt an A-lister would want to sponsor it


but... charlize looks good, IMO.
she always does

L'oreal is just Lancome, my mum works for Lancome, they're on exactly the same level as far as how good their products are but Lancome is just targeted for a different audience.
Charlizes boobs look floppster

 

[prixi]

She looks great. But of course, L'oreal's ads are always either boring, tacky, or both. What can we expect...

 

[Purr]

Originally posted by poo+Jul 6th, 2004 - 3:25 am--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (poo @ Jul 6th, 2004 - 3:25 am)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Purr@May 26th, 2004 - 10:02 am
L'orel is such a bad brand. they must pay a lot of money otherwise I doubt an A-lister would want to sponsor it


but... charlize looks good, IMO.
she always does

L'oreal is just Lancome, my mum works for Lancome, they're on exactly the same level as far as how good their products are but Lancome is just targeted for a different audience.
Charlizes boobs look floppster [/b][/quote]
yes i know that. they are owned by the same people, but they are different products... all brands are owned by the same people anyway. did you know supermarket's own brands are actually made by high end products? would you say "sainbury's" night cream equals "estee lauder" night cream? i wouldn't, bt in truth, they're made by the same people at the same factory