Cosmopolitan - Worldwide

[steeltoe]

Anyone else here notice the same celebrities from the past few months are being used on different mags? Here, let me explain:

Carrie Underwood was on September Allure and now she's on December Elle. Nicole Kidman was on November Elle and now she's one December Glamour & Australian Harper's. Jessica Simpson was on August Elle and now she's on December Cosmo. Drew Barrymore was on November Harper's and now she's on POP. Did I miss anything here?

Why can't these mags just use, oh I don't know, real models?

Actually, Jessica Simpson was on September Elle, and InStyle the month after.

And then this.

But the point is: Why, oh why did she get another cover? Geez.

 

[LizzyF]

Her covers always look the same. I think have seen that cover a bunch of times!.
And she has crossed the line of being sexy to be just...

 

[diorelle]

I'm tired of reading about her "career."
She is such a hasbeen! She always looks so tacky and whoreish on every cover she does!

 

[Paws]

totally agree,,,that cover is horrible!!!

I agree also............

 

[ckgirlbr]

Cosmopolitan Australia December 2008 : Britney Spears

tengossip

 

[ckgirlbr]

The photo is a re-print of 2003, from Esquire.

 

[FashinKid90]

Dang, They went that far back for a Re-print

 

[Flashbang]

"How a broken Britney bounced back"



but..the photo is 5 years ago...soo that means she's go back in time?

 

[lucy92]

wow, 5 years is a helluva long time do a reprint from!

 

[Flashbang]

"Sexy vs Skanky"

who's Skanky??? hmmmmmmmmmmm

 

[diorelle]

5 years!

...well it is an Australian publication!

 

[tarsha]

This kind of background had Georgian Cosmopolitan October 2007 (scarlett johansson cover)

 

[sweetpop]

There was an smal article about the cover as well in the MX newspaper here, they were quite bewildered too- Yes, Britney looks really vibrant and ready to take on anything, but the fact that it was 5 years ago- even before she had her 2 sons and got married- you can't really compare can you? Perhaps they were counting on the hope that people wouldn't realise? Or perhaps this is a clever ploy of theirs to generate more speculation about whats inside (get people wondering whether the interview is 5 years old too or something) the magazine, hence gererating more sales?

 

[surrealseven]

Yeah, we know how Australian publications reprint covers!

 

[Eshe]

This magazine is a joke. It's sad because they could do quite well as their fashion team is decent for this type of magazine, it's just the lack of good writers and everything else...

 

[MissMagAddict]

Ugh... all of these Cosmo editions are polluting the forum

 

[surrealseven]

^ I thought so too, their covers are uninteresting and it has nothing got to do with fashion.

 

[TommyGirl]

It`s not only Australian disease, other editions of Cosmo are just as bad. From magazine to magazine, similar, boring articles, supposed-to-be-funny-tips ( suitable for 15 years old teen ) and uninteresting editorials, not to even mention the covers...Cosmo is going down-in every continent.

 

[Urban Stylin]

well the cover says cheap ways to feel happier...i guess they were searching for hapiness in the past!

 

[MissMagAddict]

It`s not only Australian disease, other editions of Cosmo are just as bad. From magazine to magazine, similar, boring articles, supposed-to-be-funny-tips ( suitable for 15 years old teen ) and uninteresting editorials, not to even mention the covers...Cosmo is going down-in every continent.

Yes... I agree... which is why I said all of these editions of Cosmo. I just happened to post the comment in this particular Cosmo thread.

Thank you TG