Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Magazines' started by russianelf, Jan 31, 2019.
I loved this video of Kate they posted awhile ago, but these centaurs are ridiculous!
Ridiculous isn't even close. It's like they are purposefully trying to be so antagonistic but for what purpose? Who is this even for? When I first saw it I was speechless and a few days later the strain on my eyes hasn't lessened. Hopefully this experiment will be short-lived.
"the inaugural print artefact"
I can't take a magazine with masthead like c*mshots seriously.
Ugh, why Travis Scott. I oddly enough like the last cover.
Odd that they're launching a beauty magazine when the likes of Allure can hardly keep head above water.
I like the way they're being so weird about it - but for me, this is potentially one magazine where the content might work better on the internet. While I'm all for watching these experimental snippets, I don't know whether I'd want to have this magazine lying around the house in printed form - in terms of buying it, I don't know which cover I dislike the least.
Maybe they're ten years too late to have had Bjork on the cover, because it feels like she would be the patron saint of this publication.
Perfect filters for Kate Moss' face
‘Zero Issue’ Pretentious as f***
I'm sick to death of 'cgi Kate Moss', already.
Just why? What a waste of money.
+ Kylie Jenner
I'm sure there's social commentary in there somewhere, but the end result looks like a Barbie x David Bowie doll that got left beside a candle and has melted a bit around one eye.