Designer ethics: Topshop uses slave labour

justlooking

Active Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
3,203
Reaction score
0
August 12, 2007
Revealed: Topshop clothes made with ‘slave labour’
Claire Newell in Port Louis, Mauritius and Robert Winnett
ONE of Britain’s richest men is profiting from Asian workers paid less than £4 a day to make clothes for his latest Kate Moss range for Topshop.

Factories supplying Sir Philip Green, who is based in Monaco and is worth nearly £5 billion, employ hundreds of Sri Lankan, Indian and Bangladeshi workers in Mauritius where they labour for up to 12 hours a day, six days a week.

Workers told The Sunday Times that they were recruited in their home countries by self-employed agents who promised wages up to five times what they receive. They pay up to £725 to get the job, equivalent to seven months’ earnings.

Once in Mauritius they receive as little as 22p to 40p an hour, about 40% below the local average wage. In at least one firm salaries are set according to race, with those from Bangladesh paid substantially less than Sri Lankans.

Green, rated seventh in The Sunday Times Rich List, largely avoids personal tax by paying dividends to his wife, Lady Tina, who lives offshore. In 2005 she was paid £1.2 billion, which amounted to £3.3m for every day of the year.

He told a reporter last week that he was having a marvellous time on his yacht off the coast of Turkey. A colour-ful character, he likes extravagant gestures. He spent an estimated £5m flying 100 friends to his 55th birthday party in the Maldives earlier this year where they were reportedly entertained by George Michael and Jennifer Lopez.

Confronted by The Sunday Times over the workers’ allegations, Green told one reporter that he had previously threatened to punch her colleague “on the nose . . . and throw him out of a window”.

The factories in Mauritius produce clothes for his firm, Arcadia, which owns Topshop, Topman, Burton, Dorothy Perkins and Miss Selfridge. Last year Green signed up the super-model Kate Moss to design a range of clothes for Topshop.

Critics say the low wages and long hours amount to “slave labour”. Neil Kearney, of the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers Federation, said: “Because of the economic conditions of a country like Mauritius, companies are unable to attract local labour. Instead they recruit migrant workers, who pay a significant fee for the job. Many migrant workers who go to work in these garment factories are like slaves.”

Workers making his clothes, many of whom were fearful of talking to a reporter, described how they are kept in crowded dormitories and work from 7am until late. “When I go to bed at the end of the day, I lay down and weep,” said one woman.

“There is a lot of pressure on us to get our targets. If we do not reach the target of 50 pieces [segments of T-shirts] per hour, then we are sent back to our dormitories and suspended,” she claimed.

The woman, a Bangladeshi worker at Compagnie Mauricienne de Textile (CMT), which makes clothes for Topman, said she had to work 12-hour days for £64 a month.

A worker at Star Knitwear, which makes T-shirts for the Topshop Kate Moss range, said they were paid £112 a month - equivalent to about 40p an hour. The T-shirts are sold in Topshop for £12.

There is growing concern within the UK fashion industry over the use of Third World labour. Jane Shepherdson, who resigned from Topshop as brand director last year, said consumers cannot keep buying cheap clothes and “not ask where they come from”.

Green does not own factories which manufacture clothes for his high street stores. He instead uses a network of independently owned factories which make garments to specifications provided by the tycoon. The process is supervised by Arcadia staff.

Arcadia is one of the few high street retailers which has not signed up to the ethical trading initiative, which sets out minimum standards and whose signatories include Next, Marks & Spencer, Tesco and Asda.

Instead, Green’s company has drawn up its own code of conduct for suppliers. This stipulates that employees should not work more than 48 hours per week. However, CMT confirmed last week that its workers were contracted for up to 70 hours, while Star said its employees usually worked 60 hours.

Yesterday Green said he was treating the allegations seriously and would investigate. He said that monitoring conditions in factories he did not own was a complicated process: “I am interested in getting things right. We have processes and procedures which all factories sign up to.

“I sent inspectors to factories to look at the working conditions, to see that they are not working in sweat-shops, that the working conditions are good. I can’t stand there and count how many hours people are working. Last night I interviewed a woman who was there four weeks ago. She said the factory was in excellent shape.

“You are telling me that factories are happy to breach our code of conduct. I’ve got to look into it.”

A spokesman for Moss declined to comment.

timesonline.com
 
It's cheap labour, but it isn't slave labour. I wish the media would be more careful with the terms they throw around.
 
^well,it's the same thing,ultimately. you're still exploiting workers for lower than average wages...

it's a crying shame and a imo,a crime against humanity. we cannot continue to abide by these mass marketers who are dishonest anymore.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sadly, I think this is more common than not

and this billionaire doesn't pay taxes. oh man, what a piece of work
 
It is sad.. but nothing on the high street can really compare against shopping what is sad is that if its so cheap making the clothes how does that excuse the increase of their prices? Topshop have gotten so expensive.
 
sadly, I think this is more common than not

and this billionaire doesn't pay taxes. oh man, what a piece of work

exactly. it's nearly impossible nowadays to buy clothing without it being made somehow through cheap labour (whether it be workers sewing the pieces or just making the fabric) unless you make your own clothing. personally i don't shop at Topshop, but it seems to be affordable for most (in comparison to prices for designer goods) so it shouldn't be a surprise that in exchange for affordibility for consumers, somewhere down the line there is cheap labour.
 
^well,it's the same thing,ultimately. you're still exploiting workers for lower than average wages...

It may be a crime against humanity, but there is a big difference between slavery and wage exploitation. The latter still makes you free, whereas the former means you are owned and can be used in any way deemed fit.
 
Let's not get our drawers tangled over semantics.

Saying "cheap labour" seems like an euphemism for what can be equated to "slave labour." These people are working for a pittance. 64 pounds per month for back breaking labor doesn't exactly make people extol the wonders of a free market.

Hard to gloss over "cheap labour" while reading an article that mentions that the owner spent 5 million pounds in travel expenses for a couple of friends to fly in for his birthday.

It never ceases to surprise me when people are willing to lavish massive amounts of money on inanimate trifles, while showing no concern for one's fellowman.
 
It's cheap labour, but it isn't slave labour. I wish the media would be more careful with the terms they throw around.

If you read the article they don't call it slave labour actually. I've highlighted the appropriate sections for easy reading.

Critics say the low wages and long hours amount to “slave labour”
Many migrant workers who go to work in these garment factories are like slaves.”

However if you also read on you see that conditions aren't favourable and aren't equal to most working conditions in more developed countries.

described how they are kept in crowded dormitories and work from 7am until late. “When I go to bed at the end of the day, I lay down and weep,” said one woman.

“There is a lot of pressure on us to get our targets. If we do not reach the target of 50 pieces [segments of T-shirts] per hour, then we are sent back to our dormitories and suspended,”

They pay up to £725 to get the job, equivalent to seven months’ earnings.

Once in Mauritius they receive as little as 22p to 40p an hour.

If they earn 64 pounds a month then it would take nearly a year to make that money back. That's assuming they don't pay rent and living costs with that money. That's also assuming they don't get suspended for not reaching the target of 50 pieces before that year is up. Any way you look at it, the situation is wrong.
 
Oh my!? So let me get this straight, the workers paid Topshop the 700 something pounds or random recruiters that money to get the job?
 
When I saw that Arcadia is up for "cheap labour" and then I saw that it was Bangladesh, India etc I wasn't surprised.

Its something that really bugs me about this industry and makes me very angry. Factories in Bangladesh, India et al are *notorious* for outsourcing to dodgy factories in the **** end of nowhere. Any self respecting retailer or label has QC's that go out to the factories themselves and check them over. Yes the mills sign contracts but they really don't take a lot of notice. They are not really worth the paper they are written on. Anyway, garment suppliers from these countries are well known throughout the rag trade as outsourcing, especially in regards to embroidery. A mill may look fine, but no one can ensure that a second or third external factory may be used later.

I don't want to tarnish them all with the same brush, but I have never had a smooth ride dealing with factories in these parts. The fabric is not that great, the price does not reflect the quality, they are always late with deliveries, fabrics have long lead times (90 days for a cotton voile is my average quote!), and 98% of the garments arrive dirty and have to be sent to an industrial laundry when they are delivered. I don't think you get value for money when you cost in all the stress that comes with it.

If I had a choice I wouldn't deal with them. They cannot be trusted, and I don't ever want to be assosciated with a product that potentially had been made with "small hands" for next to nothing. I'm not accusing Arcadia of using child labour, but if it comes out of that region, you can never be sure.
 
Let's not get our drawers tangled over semantics.

Saying "cheap labour" seems like an euphemism for what can be equated to "slave labour." These people are working for a pittance. 64 pounds per month for back breaking labor doesn't exactly make people extol the wonders of a free market.

Hard to gloss over "cheap labour" while reading an article that mentions that the owner spent 5 million pounds in travel expenses for a couple of friends to fly in for his birthday.

It never ceases to surprise me when people are willing to lavish massive amounts of money on inanimate trifles, while showing no concern for one's fellowman.

Exactly, but at the same time the prices of the clothes will go up...
 
I feel sick, literally sick.

The majority of my wardrobe is entirely Topman. I'll know to think twice next time.
 
OMG! How does TopShop gets away with this?

There shud be people picketing outside the stores right now .. are there any updates on ths matter (article is a bit old).
 
OMG! How does TopShop gets away with this?

There shud be people picketing outside the stores right now .. are there any updates on ths matter (article is a bit old).
I feel like most ppl get away with stuff like this...sadly. I never buy anything tommy hilfiger after I saw something like this on the news about his company and my mum told me I wasn't allowed to buy anything TH
 
sadly, I think this is more common than not

and this billionaire doesn't pay taxes. oh man, what a piece of work

Typical, and people quiz Elton John who drops £250k in one sitting at Versace?
As he says, I live in Britain, I pay my taxes. At least someone is...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
211,911
Messages
15,167,398
Members
85,789
Latest member
Aza
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->