Phuel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Messages
- 5,427
- Reaction score
- 7,484
^^^ All his hype is paid for. You know, I’d much prefer someone like Jerry Lorenzo at Dior Men than Kim. I wouldn’t touch a lick of FOG, but despite how basic, how corporate Jerry’s designs are, it still possesses more personality than Kim’s.. and we’re talking about hoodies here.
LOL Yes— a brand is infinitely invaluable for the creatively-bankrupt. God— this man is such a plague of blandness and soullessness: Vuitton, Dior and now Fendi. Of course he would think so highly of himself. When one’s bastardized one high-end label after another to such financial success, it’s understandable why such a lesser would have such delusional grandeurs of his efforts.
That was I was saying with the archival/heritage house advantage! Of course no one would buy his clothing without the LV or Dior tag! I am not sure anyone on this forum likes him, but he definitely has a loyal base. I love that description of his work “nondescript”. I couldn’t have said it better myself.
I find it interesting how he acts so intellectual and sophisticated though. I was watching an interview in which he discussed his personal archive that was filled with art work, old English “royalty” clothing from the likes of Vivienne Westwood and such, and supposedly 6,000 vinyl records. For someone so cultured, how these so called relics do not translate into his work is beyond me. Truly he spends more time collecting than pushing menswear forward, but hey, that is just my opinion.
LOL Yes— a brand is infinitely invaluable for the creatively-bankrupt. God— this man is such a plague of blandness and soullessness: Vuitton, Dior and now Fendi. Of course he would think so highly of himself. When one’s bastardized one high-end label after another to such financial success, it’s understandable why such a lesser would have such delusional grandeurs of his efforts.