Emanuel Ungaro S/S 10 Paris | Page 9 | the Fashion Spot

Emanuel Ungaro S/S 10 Paris

nytimes.com

A Controversial Debut for Lohan in Paris
by ERIC WILSON
Published: October 4, 2009
Paris


“PAS possible,” said Fabien Baron, the noted French art director shortly after the Emanuel Ungaro show on Sunday. “Call the fashion police!”
When Lindsay Lohan’s controversial appointment as artistic adviser of the French label was announced last month, Mounir Moufarrige, the new chief executive of Ungaro, said his intention was to give the aging brand the equivalent of “electric shock treatment.” But based on the reaction to the collection that was shown here at the Louvre, the first designed by Estrella Archs with Ms. Lohan’s advice, he achieved more than that: Editors and buyers who were present said it was they who were shocked.
Some of the models appeared in loose-fitting jackets that flapped open to reveal that they wore sequin-covered pasties, in the shape of hearts, on their breasts, leaving several people in the audience aghast. A few dresses looked as if they had been painted onto the models.
“We love Lindsay Lohan — as an actress,” Mr. Baron said. “Period.” At the next show, Greg Kessler, a photographer for Style.com, was snapping pictures of front-row guests and asking them to pose as Ms. Lohan by holding up their hands, ashamedly, in front of their faces.
Celebrity fashion designers have, until now, been a mostly American phenomenon, with lines targeted to department stores under labels by Jennifer Lopez, Gwen Stefani and Justin Timberlake, among many others. But Ms. Lohan’s arrival at a 45-year-old Paris house known for $1,500 dresses and a tradition of couture craftsmanship is entirely different, something akin to a McDonald’s fry cook taking the reins of a three-star Michelin restaurant.
The day before the show, Ms. Lohan was staring at herself in a mirror in Ungaro’s grand offices on the Avenue Montaigne, a stone’s throw from the ateliers of Yves Saint Laurent, Givenchy and other famous French labels. She picked up a black and white scarf and tied it around her head, then replaced it with a black one, and then clumsily stuck a red sequin-covered heart to the side of her head while a team of designers watched her. Ms. Lohan represents a modern version of a fashion muse. She is an actress who is being paid — with a deal reported to be worth millions — to serve as artistic adviser, most unlike the classic image, for example, of Loulou de la Falaise, the dear friend of Saint Laurent and daughter of the model Maxime de la Falaise, who would gently nudge a bow and whisper to the great couturier that it looked chicer that way.
“This is just so cool,” Ms. Lohan said, turning her attention to a white minidress splattered with sequins. “It needs more rhinestones, just so it pops.” Off to the seamstress it went. Pointing to another white dress, she said: “I call it Michelle Pfeifer in ‘Scarface.’ I was just in my office sketching for next season. I was here until, like, one o’clock last night.”
With French fashion in a state of disarray due to the ongoing effects of the recession, which has already claimed at least one couture house in Christian Lacroix, several editors here at Paris Fashion Week have expressed concerns that other European houses may attempt to further their associations with celebrities like Ms. Lohan just to generate publicity. Many companies already have exclusive deals to dress actresses or feature them in their ad campaigns, like Chanel with Nicole Kidman and Giorgio Armani with Cate Blanchett. But no other has hired a celebrity to influence design, and the degree of Ms. Lohan’s involvement became clear during a preview when a seamstress, speaking in French, complained to Ms. Archs that she did not want to make further changes to a dress until “Mam’selle” had made up her mind.
Since the retirement five years ago of Emanuel Ungaro, who was famous for making the color fuchsia chic, the house has languished with a revolving door of designers, the last of whom, Esteban Cortazar, quit when Mr. Moufarrige first suggested hiring Ms. Lohan as his collaborator. Ms. Archs, a Spanish designer who also shows a signature line in Paris, was hastily hired to replace him. The label now has sales of about $200 million from fragrance and less-expensive lines sold in Asia, but the runway collection, Mr. Moufarrige said, has been losing money for years.
Ungaro’s latest maneuver was at least effective in drawing a heavy-hitting audience to the show on Sunday, as the editors in chief of Harper’s Bazaar, In Style and Elle and buyers from Saks Fifth Avenue, Bloomingdale’s and Bergdorf Goodman all attended. But they scrambled for the exits as soon as the show ended, with little applause as Ms. Lohan and Ms. Archs took a bow together on the runway. One retail chief said he had asked for a ticket only because he thought the show would be a spectacle.
“You know,” Glenda Bailey, the editor of Bazaar said before a question was half asked, “if you don’t mind, I have to run out the door.”
Virginie Mouzat, the fashion director of the French newspaper Le Figaro, described Ms. Lohan’s hire as a nonevent from a fashion perspective, but she said she was concerned about what it might portend. “Maybe this is the next step of using people by fashion brands,” she said. “But when you look at her own style, for me, she is not really relevant first, regarding fashion and second, regarding a couture house like Ungaro. Maybe she would be relevant for Kookai,” she said, referring to a label that is considered, among the fashion elite, as “not us.”
Mr. Moufarrige, during an interview in his office above the Ungaro store on Avenue Montaigne, argued that the controversy could still be good for the brand. He pointed out that he has made controversial hires in the past that ultimately were vindicated, noting that he replaced Karl Lagerfeld with Stella McCartney, the daughter of Paul McCartney, at Chloé in 1997. Though Ms. McCartney’s appointment indeed ruffled feathers among the French design establishment, she did have formal design training and has since gone on to develop a successful signature line.
“I’ll tell you one thing on the level,” he said, blowing cigarette smoke toward the blue oval ceiling, which was designed by Mr. Ungaro when it was his office. “I am crazy. Someone said there are not enough crosses to put me on.”
While he acknowledged that his main goal in hiring Ms. Lohan was to generate publicity, he said he also believes she will excite consumers. He said he was actually surprised the criticism had not been even more negative.
The market for luxury goods has been so bad, he said, that hiring a traditional designer would not make enough of a difference to get people into his stores. With retailers cutting their orders by 30 percent or more this year, there was little chance that Ungaro could survive without getting more attention. He said he did not believe that Ms. Lohan’s history of well-publicized personal problems would get in the way of her job at Ungaro or have a detrimental impact on the brand.
At that moment, his cell phone rang. It was a security guard telling him that Ms. Lohan and her sister, Ali, had gone downstairs into the store to try on some clothes. The store, in fact, was now mobbed.
 
What a mess of a collection. It's so dated and tacky. I can't imagine anyone taking this house seriously with Lindsay involved.. And that modtv video! What is she on?!
 
I agree with Hilary Alexander.. what a mess, but can you really blame Lohan and Estrella Archs? 3 weeks!! This is not project runway.. you can just bet those in charge are just fine with what came out.. they put Lohan in charge to get PRESS PRESS PRESS.. and this is exactly what is happening, good or bad press.

Call me insane and this may be blasphemous but I hope for the best for the duo at Ungaro.. what if they fail? Who is next? I am tired of revolving doors at these major fashion houses... I wish them the best and they are able to polish up their act for the next show in February.

But i must say.. seeing Kinga in pasties :shock: i never thought I'd see the day.. but.. I'll still give them a chance.. even with that horrible crime..
 
It's a pretty decent collection for 3 weeks. I mean 3 weeks. You don't expect it to be impressive whatsoever. I bet most reviews could have not been as worse if Lindsay wasn't involved in this. I think most people are just prejudiced towards her. Let's just wait next season for their collection done with enough time and not 3 weeks.
 
I'm having trouble seeing the good in these clothes. It's not even a matter of who to blame (though the way I see it, whoever takes the bow takes the rap)...the clothes just look cheap, and not in the fun Balmain way that fashion has been obsessed with, but cheap in the poorly made way. None of what I saw looks like it should have the pricetag that it will. Beyond the quality though, which I know was largely unavoidable given the time frame that the collection was completed in, there are just poor design decisions here. The heart prints, the overly retro designs, the garish colors, the PASTIES...those are things that could have been avoided and weren't, and that worries me.
 
Ungaro got what they wanted, a ton of publicity...that's really all Lindsay could give. It's funny that 5 years ago this brand meant something different than it does right now.
 
Ungaro got what they wanted, a ton of publicity...that's really all Lindsay could give. It's funny that 5 years ago this brand meant something different than it does right now.

agreed! i think the nytimes article said it all!
 
Call me insane and this may be blasphemous but I hope for the best for the duo at Ungaro.. what if they fail? Who is next? I am tired of revolving doors at these major fashion houses... I wish them the best and they are able to polish up their act for the next show in February...

Well, let's see how it goes- although if I were a betting man I would say the odds are Lindsay has already had her moment- between her questionable 'input' and her pronounced personal problems, I doubt she'll be a factor after this collection... As for who is next- the new president as much as said this was a Hail Mary Pass- there will probably not be an Ungaro if things don't turn around really fast, which I doubt will happen- there are certainly not enough Lindsay wanna-bes out there buying $1,500.00 dresses...... :huh:
 
It's a pretty decent collection for 3 weeks. I mean 3 weeks. You don't expect it to be impressive whatsoever. I bet most reviews could have not been as worse if Lindsay wasn't involved in this. I think most people are just prejudiced towards her. Let's just wait next season for their collection done with enough time and not 3 weeks.
I'm totally agree.

I really wish they can show an improvement next season. I feel so bad for Linds.
Btw, I'm loving Hilary Alexander more, what a darling:heart:
 
the pasties is just a giant publicity stunt. :rolleyes:
 
if someone to be blamed or need to be fired here is Mr. Mounir Moufarrige, since the day he gave the order to dismiss Giambatsi Valli & the house of Ungaro in troubles,

he had such a horrible sense of fashion & it is not only with Ungaro, all the brands that under his direction are not chic anymore in both sectors perfumes & fashion.
 
I hope Estrella had something to say to Lindsay about Lindsay claiming she designed the collection. That was a pretty sleazy thing to do IMO.

I remember Lindsay trying desperately to court celebrities to appear at the show (Miley Cyrus, Sarah Silverman), anyone know if any actually turned up?
 
It's clear Lindsay did little for this collection because I can't imagine her in any of it. Except for the tiny body-con dresses, that is.
 
Lindsay...give it up.
its just not working for you. i dont kno who declared lindsay lohan a fashion icon, but whoever did probably wished they never opened their mouth after seeing this half-***ed collection. its like versace's last collection with those damned hearts with a hint of jil sander, and a smidgen of sl*tty cocktail dress for the common hollywood socialite..i hate it.
Lindsay ur fired.
 
Hearts but No Soul

By SUZY MENKES
Published: October 4, 2009

PARIS — The Emanuel Ungaro show on Sunday may go down in history as the final gasp of celebrity madness. A battery of lenses focused on the finale, when Lindsay Lohan, Hollywood star, music maker and current bad girl, walked the runway, blonde hair swishing, as the brand’s new creative director. Beside her was the Spanish designer Estrella Archs, who had the unenviable task of getting this collection ready in just three weeks to walk the shocking-pink runway.

There were some good things to say about the show. For a start, there were not as many of the visible bras that have been out there on other catwalks. But that was because there were often no bras at all — only wardrobe malfunctions, bits of black masking tape or sequined pasties popping from jackets tricked out with hearts.

This was certainly a sweetheart moment. A Saint Valentine wave of scarlet hearts appeared as rounded handbags, as vivid prints or as the broken-heart scarlet lapels of a black tailored jacket. Or they were stuck anywhere from forehead to bustier and even used as a cut-out motif on a jacket, where sequins peeked through the gaps.

Otherwise, there were short skirts. And even shorter skirts. One hemline revealed the curvy derrière that paparazzi might hope to snap in a downtown club — but not what you would expect on a sophisticated catwalk. The faintest whiff of the East brought soft harem pants and dresses that draped the models’ skinny bodies.

Emanuel Ungaro was a couture king of drape and shape. When a swathe of white dress was covered with a white fur stole, there was some attempt to move from teen night out to a couture elegance. Yet will this collection of hearts but with no soul be enough to entice young women who could probably find these looks anywhere?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/fashion/05iht-rungaro.html?_r=1&hpw

ouch.
 
I really like the heart blazer but as someone else commented, you'd buy it from Topshop, not Ungaro.
 
Lindsay is a doll being used by the CEO of Ungaro,but I wanna know how much money or clothes she can take from the project
 
I think people should calm down and take a deep breath on this one. The past few years have been a constant downfall for the house and i believe this collection is not exception indeed. But comparing this to what Cortazar did during his time, I have to confess that Archs may have brought things to a positive side. Though it still stays below "acceptable" for a prestigious maison, I'm going to close my eyes on this one and waiting for the next season. I'll be putting hope in it because after seeing what Dundas made of Pucci this season i really think I should be more patient with Ungaro for the time being.

I guess that holding this show in Paris doesn't help it either. Besides getting overshadowed in matter of fractions of seconds by mighty experts of the business, being in Paris is just too much for a fragile brand as this; it's too much pressure and for the time being the stake of that place is just impossible to reach by a troubled house like this. Ungaro is not Balmain which made a brilliant thing seasons ago when it really needed something to shake things up and reason to be put again on fashion map. And thankfully to that it now just keeps getting sluttier and cheaper whenever it wants because it earned a kind of bulletproof vest, an harsh-criticism-cushion... which is a comodity that Ungaro doesn't have.

I think they really should redefine other areas of the business also to really keep things going, though I must admit that i find the "Lohan stunt" one of the funniest moves in fashion history of these past three years.
I believe the media is being a bit too harsh on them. The facts are these: the entire collection was pulled in less than one month; the house itself was already holding a bad reputation since its master's departure; and its creative designer is just a boho that's trying to get things right but still holds the boho status... what do you expect from an equation like that?
This is no worse than when Cortazar or Dundas were commanding the ship. It's no better either. It's just what it is and i agree with comments saying that rich girls will buy this. If they buy boring LV classics or Burberry lifeless checks (not speaking of runway shows for both cases of course), why not also buying Ungaro touched by a drunk celebutant?

I so agreee on the whole Balmain thing. Decarnin's collections get worse and worse, and people don't even seem to mind, cause he had those great season where he reinvented the big shoulders. Kudos to him, but he needs to keep up the work, and he slacking in my opinion.
He can make the worsts collection, and people will still praise him, because he had a few good ones.
The fashion industry is a weird weird place!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,354
Messages
15,298,529
Members
89,322
Latest member
Jimington
Back
Top