Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Ads' started by Flashbang, Jan 12, 2010.
Megan Fox? Seriously? What a terrible choice.
She looks so awkward in these shots... The airbrushing looks so unnatural too.
I'm so tired of her.
I'd expect more from Emporio Armani...
She's hot, but this is a disappointment for me too.
this is so boring, could have done so much more with her
it is definitely a disappointment, but Megan is smoking hot. wow.
i'm prepared to see a lot of comments about how she isn't "beautiful" or how everyone is "tired" of seeing her.
She is HOTTT.. but yeah.. I expected more with the callaboration.. it doesn't POP to me. Maybe it'll look better in glossy paper.
What? This is the outcome? Seriously?? Her face looks like it was photoshopped on someone's else body. Is this seriously the ad? Cause I can't believe this.
oh no!!!why her?!
they look like photoshoot in GQ rather than an ad
The good thing about the ad is that it doesn't even look like Megan Fox It's still underwhelming and boring. They could at least have made this one overly sexy or something, that would have made me understand them choosing Megan Fox. But it's just blah.
I love megan and I think she is perfect for underwear ads but those shots are just bad
Hot megan but disappointing! was expecting for more
Victoria's were much more appealing than these, they had more of an edge.
I've never been a one for Megan Fox, but I must admit that she looks good here, quite natural looking.
I like the second shot but I was expecting so much from the photographers, label and even herself, who's got a great body.
I don't really like it, that's insipid.
Disappointing. I love Megan Fox but is this the best they could do to her? I mean, these could have been better.
Well, I think Megan is very hot but her eyes are dead and these frames aren't great.
Okay, Victoria and David was so much hotter in them than Megan is. This is such a downgrade.