Faux v. Fur ... Fashion's hairiest debate

Discussion in 'Fashion... In Depth' started by HeatherAnne, Mar 10, 2018.

View Users: View Users
  1. HeatherAnne

    HeatherAnne Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    23,533
    Likes Received:
    98
    It's a copyright violation to post the article, but it's definitely worth following the link and reading, as it discusses the costs of faux fur on the environment.

    I personally don't see the need for either.
     
  2. Melancholybaby

    Melancholybaby Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    13,881
    Likes Received:
    104
    ^When I click on the link it takes me to a subscription page. I can access it from a google search though.

    Thanks for starting the thread, HeatherAnne! I read the article two days ago and the part that interested me the most was the fact that Gucci is looking to develop faux fur made of biogradable fabric. Until that happens, I'm with you, there's no need for fur, real or synthetic.
     
  3. BetteT

    BetteT Mod Squad Team Leader

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    22,578
    Likes Received:
    32
    Here's another article ... by Mark Oaten, CEO of the International Fur Trade Federation in Huffington Post so it has to biased ... but nor more biased than PETA ... and it puts forth a good point: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/mark-oaten/faux-fur-is-more-than-a-f_b_11294686.html
    Kill animals or kill the environment? Seems like fur (real or faux) is pretty harmful and unnecessary for warmth in this modern age.
     
    #3 BetteT, Mar 11, 2018
    Last edited by moderator Natasa: Mar 12, 2018
  4. Lola701

    Lola701 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2014
    Messages:
    3,975
    Likes Received:
    463
    Maybe the best compromise is to promote furs from animals that people actually eats or wears clothes from. I don't see anything wrong with lambskin fur, sheep fur/Shearling, Goat fur. I think today furriers can develop ways to work with those 3 categories.

    I think the problem with fur is maybe a matter of "personification". A fox is not a domestic animal so, no matter how hard PETA will find ways to show it to people, those same people can't relate to it. The same for mink. A mink is quite cute but how many people know what an actual mink look like?

    On top of that, fur involves a lot of jobs and some part of the world are still living out of that.

    At the end of the day, the consumer is the one who respond and influence the industry. And obviously, the vast majority of consumers wants fur and for me the most honest way to do it is by using the same sources as the ones for the bags and clothes.
     
  5. billiejbob

    billiejbob Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2015
    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    39
    Faux fur is terrible for the environment...especially the way it's manufactured.
    At least with real fur it's 100% biodegradable (obviously as long as you remove the inner silk lining etc)

    I'm from Australia where fur is really unnecessary to wear but it amazes me that more fox fur isn't used because fox is a MAJOR foreign pest in Australia. We are ethically obliged to kill all foxes here no matter how cute they look because they are killing SO MUCH of our native fauna. It's really bad! I have a farm in rural Victoria but now live in the Australian Capital Territory and the damage foxes do to native bird and small mammal communities is devastating.

    I've always thought about creating fox fur coats and other items used from the wild pest foxes killed by hunters here. It perfectly balances out the ethical problems because it's not using farmed animals and it's helping the Australian biodiversity.
     
  6. StockholmFW

    StockholmFW Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2017
    Messages:
    3,263
    Likes Received:
    91
    I you're promptly going to wear fur: vintage fur.
     
  7. dior_couture1245

    dior_couture1245 Fat Karl

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,630
    Likes Received:
    100
    See - this is an incredibly interesting perspective, and so important. Thank you for sharing.

    All these companies who go on with their moral preening about switching over to faux-fur as if they were MLK Jr. and then everyone applauding them as if they were God, really is so unintelligent.

    You've provided a very realistic and compelling pro-fur argument. People need to wake up and understand that life is simply not black and white. There are pros and cons to every choice made. Rewards and consequences. There is never a fix-all, win-win solution. So - companies like Gucci and Versace have banned fur? Now what? Also, as Lola mentioned, many small, local, indigenous communities have survived for centuries on the fur trade - indigenous communities that we're always scolded into treating with the utmost sensitivity - "don't you dare use their cultural iconography!" But what about when it comes to their actual, real-life livelihood? So much for all the compassion and "wokeness..."

    Plus, people act like wearing fur is some evil specific to Western society. People in every corner of the world have worn fur for since the beginning of time for survival AND for decoration and status. What purpose would abolishing it serve?

    And again, the ecological component to faux fur is terrible, it's shelf life is pretty abysmal and it doesn't offer any longevity. Who passes down a faux fur coat through the generations? It's pretty wasteful. Real fur, on the other hand, lasts and is cherished for several generations, at least. Which is more eco-friendly between the two? People love to act like anyone who wears fur is Cruella de Vil, or is dumping their used coats into a landfill for waste. Very delusional. I guarantee that the absolute majority of people who buy fur do not treat it disrespectfully - most are well aware of the value and cost (both the literal and figurative) of what they are purchasing and treat it accordingly.

    Furthermore, anyone who lives in regions that get extremely cold in the winter, real fur (or real down, etc) is the difference between "pure misery" and "survival." As someone who lived in NY for many years, I can tell you the difference between wearing a synthetic puffer and an authentic down or fur jacket during the winter is noticeable, to say the least.

    All in all, I don't think faux fur SHOULDN'T exist, and I don't mind people being opposed to fur, either - but what I do find to be frustrating is the delusion that real fur is pure evil and morally repugnant and faux fur is virtuous above critique. And, maybe more than anything - I find the mentality particularly reprehensible than anyone thinks they have the right to control what someone else on this earth wishes to do with their life. If someone wants to wear fur - allow them to partake. Opt out for yourself. End of story.
     
    #7 dior_couture1245, Mar 22, 2018
    Last edited by moderator Paralled: Mar 22, 2018
  8. FashionMuseDior

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    1
    ***Edited***

    There is a difference between a man who comes from an indigenous tribe and wears fur because of the following things:
    -Survival (Low temperatures)
    -Tradition
    -Goods (They usually exchange their furs for other goods through common barter)

    ***Edited***

    Normal people like you and me DO NOT need to wear real fur. Real fur is treated just like any other luxury item: A piece that you wear for prestige which is IMO 100% wrong because that's not what it was meant to be when humans started to wear fur for survival.

    ***Edited*** I'm just glad that people are finally getting rid of this insane habit of killing animals just so that lady who married a rich husband can wear a grotesque coat so she can show off and 'flex' to her friends.
     
    #8 FashionMuseDior, Mar 26, 2018
    Last edited by moderator Natasa: Mar 26, 2018
  9. billiejbob

    billiejbob Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2015
    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    39
    Using that logic, people don't need leather shoes, or leather belts, or leather handbags and purses, leather skirts, or leather anything really...but they do. And once again, pleather is WAY worse for the environment than actual leather.

    It's about being sustainable for the environment and being ethical in the treatment of animals and biodiversity. Hence my previous point about using feral foxes or other feral animals to produce fur items.
     
  10. PierreGotha

    PierreGotha Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2018
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    9
    What's the point of Luxury if you can't use the finest materials? Besides, Faux-fur is unsustainable and if you're going to invest your money, it might as well in the real one.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. vetements

    vetements Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    800
    Likes Received:
    8
    I love how nonchalantly and plainly you put it lol, but i agree with you, diorcouture and definitely feeling the pain of billiejbob.

    whilst i am sure there are some super rich people who buys and collects fur to flaunt, I think they are probably the minority.

    And if some people argue that using fur is not as necessary as eating meat (both killing animals), that is bs as well, since there are vegans too.

    and then of course, there is the leather argument like billie pointed out above.

    faux fur, in my opinion, is just damaging to the environment, period. if we have to ban fur, might as well just go do without it totally.
     
    #11 vetements, Apr 4, 2018
    Last edited by moderator Natasa: Apr 4, 2018
  12. softgrey

    softgrey flaunt the imperfection

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2004
    Messages:
    52,407
    Likes Received:
    34
    just wear vintage fur...
    those animals are already dead and you honor them by continuing to use their skins rather than chucking them on a garbage heap...

    anyway- that's what i do and have always done...
    people give me their furs, actually, when an older relative passes away or whatever...
    they know i will take care of them and appreciate them and give them a good home...

    i feel like the folks that flaunt their fur are the nouveau riche...
    you can figure out who they are...
    ^_^
     
  13. softgrey

    softgrey flaunt the imperfection

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2004
    Messages:
    52,407
    Likes Received:
    34
    just have to say...
    has anyone checked out Fendi's website?
    they do fur that is on a whole other level...
    it's really incredible...
    they have videos that show the pieces being put together ...
    honestly, from the perpective of workmanship, it is just remarkable...

    i was just watching with my mouth hanging open...

    and then i went to the store and saw the actual pieces in person...
    unbelievable work...
     
  14. PierreGotha

    PierreGotha Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2018
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    9
    This!

    An example to why i still support the fur trade.

    This industry is in dire need of proper craftsmanship, because people are unknowingly sacrificing it for their pecksniffish motives.
     
  15. dior_couture1245

    dior_couture1245 Fat Karl

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,630
    Likes Received:
    100
    Ok. You just slayed me with “pecksniffish.” I love it.
     
  16. Lola701

    Lola701 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2014
    Messages:
    3,975
    Likes Received:
    463
    Speaking of Fendi, I wonder if they are going to show Haute Fourrure this season.
    Because one thing is sure: the luxury customer still buy furs.

    There’s something so funny about those fashion houses stopping doing Fur. They are doing it as a PR/Marketing move because the people who are on social media complaining about the use of furs are not necessarily their furs or RTW customers and even more, that clientele is not boycotting those brands because of their use of fur.

    Look at Fendi: 3rd biggest LVMH brand, big fur business, growing RTW business and big sales of bags.
     
  17. dior_couture1245

    dior_couture1245 Fat Karl

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,630
    Likes Received:
    100
    A lesson I’m sure these brands will soon have to learn...never give into the mob. The mob is never satisfied.
     
  18. Melancholybaby

    Melancholybaby Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    13,881
    Likes Received:
    104
    It wouldn't make any sense for Fendi to stop fur, it's so ingrained into their brand DNA and history, it's the one thing they absolutely specialize in.

    But as always you did raise a valid point, Lola. The people that cry for boycotts on social media are not necessarily the people actually buying the clothes. Dolce & Gabbana made these stupid "Boycott D&G" t-shirts as a response to some scandal and they sold out. It's clear most luxury customers do not care about these things and they probably don't even follow any SJW on instagram and twitter.
     
  19. softgrey

    softgrey flaunt the imperfection

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2004
    Messages:
    52,407
    Likes Received:
    34
    Gucci is the biggest bunch of hypocrites as far as I can tell.

    They stop using fur but they have their nyc flagship in Trump Tower-
    This is the guy who just made it legal to import endangered animals carcasses and whose sicko sons are proud of killing elephants and other big game.

    It’s all BS.
    #wecallbs
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"